Teams

FK Barlet

2025 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-20vs CCO SteedLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamelia Payne / Beatrice Barlet vs Lisa Steed / Lauren Stevenson3-6, 2-6
2025-11-24vs Marion/DellovadeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJenny Neelands / Melissa Justis vs Caroline Murray / Melissa Galloway6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dickerson / Judith Bertran vs Madison Sagas / Abigail Dellovade1-6, 1-6
2025-11-21vs Marion/DellovadeLost 03
L#1 DoublesBonnie Keating / Melissa Justis vs Diana Royo / Sharon Christie Ybanez1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dickerson / Andrea Love vs Madison Sagas / Abigail Dellovade7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPamelia Payne / Beatrice Barlet vs Nicole DeBolt / Lucy Kaul2-6, 1-6
2025-11-14vs CCO SteedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dickerson / Lauren Indelicato vs Tanner Watts / Lauren Stevenson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJenny Neelands / Judith Bertran vs Susan Atwell / Elise Atwell6-1, 6-0
2025-10-24vs CCO SteedWon 21
W#1 DoublesJenny Neelands / Ashley Spink vs Pamela Rice / Amanda Miller6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIrina Madorsky / Marlene Townsend vs Lauren Stevenson / Tanner Watts2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJudy Hoops / Elizabeth Dickerson vs Debby Watts / Doreen Raudenbush6-1, 7-6
2025-09-27vs Marion/DellovadeWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Neelands / Melissa Justis vs Eileen Lombardo / Kayleen Quinn6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesIrina Madorsky / Ashley Spink vs Dina Sapienza / Sharon Christie Ybanez5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Alyssa Ray
published 4
3.86
Elizabeth Dickerson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Jenny Neelands
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Bonnie Keating
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
TARA BROMIRSKI
published
3.57
Lauren Indelicato
published
3.55
Beatrice Barlet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Judith Bertran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Ashley Spink
published 3.5
3.45
Irina Madorsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Andrea Love
published 3.5
3.42
Melissa Justis
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.40
Judy Hoops
published
3.31
Mary Mccue
published
3.29
Marlene Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pamelia Payne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Justis + Jenny Neelands21763% games+26.9% vs expected
Ashley Spink + Jenny Neelands10362% games+11.1% vs expected
Judith Bertran + Melissa Justis5257% games+1.4% vs expected
Ashley Spink + Irina Madorsky10262% gamesnot enough data
Irina Madorsky + Jenny Neelands4449% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Spink + Judith Bertran5168% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Spink + Melissa Justis2346% gamesnot enough data
Judith Bertran + Jenny Neelands3265% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alyssa Ray
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Elizabeth Dickerson
264W–115L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Jenny Neelands
243W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Bonnie Keating
243W–234L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
TARA BROMIRSKI
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Lauren Indelicato
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Beatrice Barlet
100W–104L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Judith Bertran
181W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Ashley Spink
133W–63L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Irina Madorsky
222W–180L career · 2 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Andrea Love
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Melissa Justis
93W–43L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Mary Mccue
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Marlene Townsend
181W–153L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Pamelia Payne
36W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.