Teams

Richardson/Memphis

2022 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Dustin Purser
published 3.5
3.21
Darrell Nephew
published 3.5
3.16
David van Horn
published 3.5
3.13
William Winstead
published
3.12
John Manshack
published
3.12
Carla Higgins
published 3
3.03
Emily Stolnicki
published 3.5
2.96
Blake Nelson
published 3.5
2.85
Michelle Connors
published
2.67
Sonya Fleck
published
2.54
Jamie Earnest
published 3
2.54
Kristy Richardson
published
Marnie Stewart
published
Michelle van Horn
published
Sid Alapati
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dustin Purser
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Darrell Nephew
15W–34L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
David van Horn
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
William Winstead
65W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%15%85%
3.13
John Manshack
68W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Carla Higgins
58W–35L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Emily Stolnicki
45W–33L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Blake Nelson
3W–15L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Michelle Connors
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.85
Sonya Fleck
19W–34L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Jamie Earnest
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Kristy Richardson
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Marnie Stewart
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle van Horn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sid Alapati
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.