Teams

Venable/MH/TLTC

2025 Combo 65 & Over · 6.5 Women (Local League at State)

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-09vs Glover/NLR/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Lou Stevens / Jann Pharo6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesToni Fisher / Sheila Sharp vs Chris McGetrick / Carol Stapleton6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Goldstein / Carolyn Kelley vs Carol Slattery / Susan Coleman6-3, 6-1
2025-11-08vs Wenzler/NLR/BPWon 21
L#1 DoublesToni Fisher / Carol Goldstein vs Kelly Oulette / Stephanie Petray6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Belinda Brolo / Joan Khilling6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDebbie Goolsby / Carolyn Kelley vs Alysanne Crymes / Sarah Hugen2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-11-08vs Ward/ArkadelphiaWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Paulette Overton / B J Hampton7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Goldstein / Toni Fisher vs Patti Peeler / Charlene Reinsch6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSheila Sharp / Debbie Goolsby vs Toni Harris / Joyce Stroud1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women (Local League at State) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Toni Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Nancy Decker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Phyllis Venable
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Carol Goldstein
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Debbie Goolsby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Carolyn Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Sheila Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Decker + Phyllis Venable15955% games+4.4% vs expected
Toni Fisher + Carol Goldstein1444% games−9.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Toni Fisher
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Nancy Decker
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Phyllis Venable
15W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Carol Goldstein
30W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
3.5
Debbie Goolsby
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91
3
Carolyn Kelley
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Sheila Sharp
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.