Teams

1.TOC.Narula

2022 CTRL Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women · Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-07vs 2.TOC.SwainWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Grasser / Tracy Lowrance vs Rebekah Swain / Shylaja Karimanye6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-23vs 2.TOC.SwainLost 01
L#2 DoublesAudrey Hollett / Tracy Grasser vs Shylaja Karimanye / Robin Rhaney3-6, 3-6
2022-04-09vs 2.TOC.SwainWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Grasser / Tracy Lowrance vs Jennifer Reynolds / Robin Rhaney6-1, 6-4
2022-04-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Grasser / Tracy Lowrance vs Tess O'Boyle / Heather Sasser6-4, 6-3
2022-03-26vs 2.TOC.SwainWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Grasser / Tracy Lowrance vs Anne Grimm / Tess O'Boyle7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-19vs 2.TOC.SwainLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Grasser / Laura Robison vs Anne Grimm / Shylaja Karimanye3-6, 1-6
2022-02-26vs 2.TOC.SwainLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Bednarcik / Tracy Lowrance vs Anne Grimm / Rebekah Swain5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Tracy Lowrance
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.87
Tracy Grasser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Audrey Hollett
published 3
2.64
Cara Casuccio
published 2.5
2.47
Laura Robison
published
2.31
Debbie Bednarcik
published 2.5
2.29
Kristina Narula
published
Reymee Denison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Grasser + Tracy Lowrance5350% gamesnot enough data
Laura Robison + Debbie Bednarcik213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tracy Lowrance
185W–109L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Tracy Grasser
146W–131L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Audrey Hollett
34W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
2.5
Cara Casuccio
23W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%15%85%
2.64
Laura Robison
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%58%42%
2.47
2.5
Debbie Bednarcik
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%93%7%
2.31
Kristina Narula
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%95%5%
2.29
Reymee Denison
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.