Teams

SpringPark/Bradley-Wilson W3.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-21vs Garland/Slote W3.5SLost 01
L#2 SinglesKirsten Hancock vs Wan Tos1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-14vs Oak Creek/Kolb-Urias W3.5SWon 10
W#1 SinglesKirsten Hancock vs Mety Valentine6-0, 6-0
2025-06-07Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKirsten Hancock vs Evyn Fairman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDeborah Schlang vs Lauren Erlacker3-6, 3-6
2025-05-31Split 11
W#1 SinglesKirsten Hancock vs Meghan Rosener6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeanne Freiberg / Lisa Carpenter vs Hazel Robbins / Tarryn Uran7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-17vs Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKirsten Hancock vs Luciana Gomez6-2, 6-2
2025-05-10vs High Point/Herling W3.5SLost 02
L#1 DoublesShanna Claytor / Kristi Cole vs Kristine Killmeyer / Danise McMahon1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarcy Dale / Shannon Robins vs Cathy Joseph / Judi Robeson1-6, 3-6
2025-05-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKristi Cole / Susan Harvey vs Jennifer Williams / Lisa Nolte4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
MARY DAMKROGER
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.60
Teri Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Stacey Zartler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Audrey Pala
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Kirsten Hancock
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.39
Amber Morefield
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Amy Wandstrat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Xtine Burrough
published
3.33
Donna BELLE
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #1 Singles 9% · published
3.29
Timla Healey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Deborah Schlang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Sarah Southcott
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
3.09
Shanna Claytor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.09
Sherri Rejebian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Lisa Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.97
JOSALYN SAMSON
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristi Cole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Leanne Freiberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marcy Dale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Robins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timla Healey + Donna BELLE8267% games+20.8% vs expected
Shanna Claytor + Amber Morefield5060% games+12.7% vs expected
Teri Wilson + Stacey Zartler12365% games+6.4% vs expected
Sherri Rejebian + Lisa Carpenter134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Wandstrat + MARY DAMKROGER314 matchesnot enough data
Teri Wilson + MARY DAMKROGER303 matchesnot enough data
Teri Wilson + Sarah Southcott213 matchesnot enough data
Timla Healey + Lisa Carpenter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MARY DAMKROGER
38W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Teri Wilson
37W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Stacey Zartler
21W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Audrey Pala
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Kirsten Hancock
26W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Amber Morefield
26W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Amy Wandstrat
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Xtine Burrough
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Donna BELLE
22W–5L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Timla Healey
21W–20L career · 10 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Deborah Schlang
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sarah Southcott
19W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Shanna Claytor
31W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Sherri Rejebian
4W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Lisa Carpenter
7W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
JOSALYN SAMSON
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Kristi Cole
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leanne Freiberg
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marcy Dale
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Robins
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.