Teams

LBK Club Dreamers

2026 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 W Friday

14 players · average NTRP / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-27vs LBK Public AitkenWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Adams / Lori Brochin vs Karen Jennings / Karen Kurgan6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Byles / Linda Gillott vs Sheliah Gruber / Gail Russell7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSandra Duryea / Julie McGue vs Bettye Sykes / Margaret Stanton6-3, 6-4
2026-03-13vs LWR No Drama MamasLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Adams / Karin Buffett vs Carol Frazier / Cindy Davis3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Duryea / Linda Gillott vs Andrea Deitch / Kathy Rain4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGinger Griffith-Schirmer / Louise Harris vs Regina Bussing / Kathleen Torrell3-6, 5-7
2026-03-06vs River Strand PetersenWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Adams / Karin Buffett vs Nancy Finman / Penny Franklin6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Byles / Linda Gillott vs Barbara Aichinger / Susanne Booth6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSandra Duryea / Sandy Schonhoff vs Leslie Adkins / Chris Poole3-6, 3-6
2026-02-27vs Sarasota/DuncanLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Adams / Linda Gillott vs Constance Duncan / Vickie Miller3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Byles / Sandra Duryea vs Mitzi Lamy / Mary Schmitz0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGinger Griffith-Schirmer / Laura Mutz vs Deanna Allard / Barbara Belanger4-6, 0-6
2026-02-13vs LWR No Drama MamasWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Duryea / Linda Gillott vs Betty Jo Zeigler / Kathleen Torrell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPattiAnn Curtin / Sandy Schonhoff vs Wendy Zevin / Kathy Lewis6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGinger Griffith-Schirmer / Nancy Smith vs Andrea Deitch / Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-02-06vs River Strand PetersenLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Gillott / Sandra Duryea vs Penny Franklin / Marsha Parrish5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Byles / Nancy Smith vs Hattie Grimsley / Susanne Booth6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-01-23vs Sarasota/DuncanLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Gillott / Karen Adams vs Mary Schmitz / Leila Wagner6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSandra Duryea / Karin Buffett vs Constance Duncan / Vickie Miller4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Mutz / Lisa Hartmann vs Dorene Seider / Susan Marro3-6, 1-6
2026-01-16vs LBK Public AitkenLost 12
L#1 DoublesKarin Buffett / Linda Gillott vs Karen Kurgan / Mary Jane Waite3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Duryea / Sandy Schonhoff vs Lisa Adams / Peggy Lavallee7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPattiAnn Curtin / Louise Harris vs Sheliah Gruber / Gail Russell2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Lori Brochin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Karen Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ginger Griffith-Schirmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie McGue
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Byles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karin Buffett
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Laura Mutz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Gillott
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Lisa Hartmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Louise Harris
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Nancy Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
PattiAnn Curtin
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Sandra Duryea
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sandy Schonhoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PattiAnn Curtin + Louise Harris5152% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Schonhoff + Karin Buffett224 matchesnot enough data
Karin Buffett + Linda Gillott123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Gillott + Sandra Duryea213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Brochin
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.13
Karen Adams
7W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.23
Ginger Griffith-Schirmer
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie McGue
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Byles
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karin Buffett
22W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Mutz
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Gillott
23W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Hartmann
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Louise Harris
11W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Smith
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
PattiAnn Curtin
25W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Duryea
6W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandy Schonhoff
45W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.