Teams

BED:Zalegowski

2026 NH Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.5 Men 1

15 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-11vs IND:Knickbocker:GaleLost 13
L#1 DoublesGordon Moseley / Michael Rubin vs Jerry Knickerbocker / David Knickerbocker4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Taylor vs Trent Newman2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLyle Nichols / Christian Durgin vs Caleb Darkes-Burkey / Hayden Frechette7-5, 7-5
L#2 SinglesBenny Gantrish vs Oscar Crainich0-6, 1-6
2026-06-13vs ALG:Bayer:GonzalesWon 40
W#1 DoublesGregory Cistulli / Gordon Moseley vs Andrew Day / Tomas Gonzalez2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Delworth vs Colin Stone6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Rubin / Andrew Pelkey vs Michael Leary / Mark Blaisdell7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMark Stocker vs David Taylor6-4, 6-4
2026-04-11vs IND:Knickbocker:GaleLost 05
L#1 DoublesAndrew Pelkey / Lyle Nichols vs David Knickerbocker / Scott Gale6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGordon Moseley vs Trent Newman1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Rubin / Edward Normand vs Caleb Darkes-Burkey / Ryan Joy1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGregory Cistulli vs Oscar Crainich3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChris Zalegowski / Christian Durgin vs Jerry Knickerbocker / Damon Fitch2-6, 6-7
2026-02-01vs ALG:Bayer:GonzalesLost 04
L#1 DoublesGregory Cistulli / Andrew Pelkey vs Michael Leary / Tomas Gonzalez3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGordon Moseley vs Blake Wayman1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBenny Gantrish / Michael Rubin vs Anthony Fernandez / Nicholas Bayer6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLars Sorenson / Christian Durgin vs Andrew Day / Chris Sporcic3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
David Delworth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Lyle Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.26
Gregory Cistulli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Benjamin Taylor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Gordon Moseley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.09
Benny Gantrish
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.06
Chris Zalegowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.03
Andrew Pelkey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Edward Normand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Michael Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.92
Lars Sorenson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.87
Drew Barwell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.84
Christian Durgin
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
John Halpin
published
Mark Stocker
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Rubin + Drew Barwell224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Rubin + Chris Zalegowski314 matchesnot enough data
Drew Barwell + Chris Zalegowski134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Rubin + Andrew Pelkey123 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Pelkey + Benjamin Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Delworth
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.50
Lyle Nichols
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Gregory Cistulli
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Benjamin Taylor
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Gordon Moseley
26W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Benny Gantrish
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
4
Chris Zalegowski
37W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.06
4.5
Andrew Pelkey
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Edward Normand
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Michael Rubin
100W–42L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
4.01
Lars Sorenson
41W–29L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
Drew Barwell
106W–46L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Christian Durgin
67W–17L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
John Halpin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Stocker
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.