Teams

FLEX:Laura Day

2024 EMA Singles Women Flex Leagues · 3.0W Singles Flex League

1 player · average NTRP / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings19 teams · 3.0W Singles Flex League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FLEX:Jennifer Brooks4040024
2FLEX:Sornalatha Rathnasamy202009
3FLEX:Emily Bourgette2121228
4FLEX:Alina Lisanke101000
5FLEX:Heather Condurso101000
6FLEX:Sibel Bialas101005
7FLEX:Paula Snow000000
8FLEX:Michele Chicoine000000
9FLEX:Laura Day000000
10FLEX:Emily Sheahan000000
11FLEX:Karen Hunt000000
12FLEX:Jodi Tucker000000
13FLEX:Christina Lo010119
14FLEX:Caroline Beaulieu0101212
15FLEX:Harmanpreet Kaur0101212
16FLEX:Regina Altreuter010129
17FLEX:Kate Girard0202426
18FLEX:Cynthia Curtis0202426
19FLEX:Zoe Jiang0202424

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Laura Day
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Day
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.