Teams

HRCA-S YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-31vs PRKR PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesPeter Clifford / Srinivasa Meka vs Chris Sanchez / Jaybin Sanchez6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRj Banat vs Michael Lampe4-6, 2-6
2026-08-24vs CPV GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSpenser Johnston / Rj Banat vs Jamie Dreyer / Jeth Harbinson6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEdwin Gomez vs Timothy Linsenmeyer6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJim Foreman / John Terry vs Brandon Short / Brandon Lail6-0, 7-5
2026-08-17vs WC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSpenser Johnston / Rj Banat vs Craig Masur / Ben Purvis6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEdwin Gomez vs Chase Adams6-1, 6-1
2026-08-10vs RRTC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJim Foreman / Rj Banat vs Manish Kapoor / Elias Gebru6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEdwin Gomez vs Bruce Chiang6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Terry / Peter Clifford vs Miguel Nunez / Alfonso Ortiz6-0, 7-6
2026-08-03vs GAC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatrick Gallagher / Spenser Johnston vs Jerry Augustin / Andy Garrobo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEdwin Gomez vs Tim Aberle7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRj Banat / Peter Clifford vs Jason Harding / Jason Wagner7-6, 6-3
2026-07-27vs CCV REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Gallagher / Spenser Johnston vs Jake Filene / Adam Bogue7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Clifford / John Terry vs Gavin McCarty / Timothy Fete6-3, 6-3
2026-07-20vs SH GOLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSpenser Johnston / Jim Foreman vs Ben Hick / Travis Vap4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEdwin Gomez vs Steve Shineman6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Edwin Gomez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.13
Spenser Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Jim Foreman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Patrick Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Peter Clifford
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Rj Banat
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.90
Scott Armbruster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Gallagher + Scott Armbruster303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Edwin Gomez
21W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.27
Spenser Johnston
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Jim Foreman
20W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
Patrick Gallagher
36W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Peter Clifford
11W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Rj Banat
21W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Scott Armbruster
11W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.