Teams

Hold Registrations 2025

Late and Hold Registrations - 2025 CY · Hold Registration Team 1

32 players · average NTRP 3.70 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Hold Registration Team 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hold Registrations 2025000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elizabeth Kobak
published 5
4.41
Ayano Nakamura
published 4.5
4.31
Mary Therese Lee
published
4.08
Jill Siegel
published
4.06
Sharon Trager
published
3.90
Justin Booms
published
3.88
Lesley Seeger
published
3.87
Joon Sung
published
3.87
Silvia Kusaka
published 4
3.87
Susan Thornquist
published 4
Gail Wilson
published 4
3.47
Paul Cowgill
published
3.42
Michael Wellems
published
3.35
Vijaykumar Patel
published
3.21
3.06
Mandar Bankhele
published
3.05
Carol Zorn
published 3.5
2.93
Daione Mitchell
published 3
2.83
Tara Snow
published
2.80
Jean Niemi
published 3
2.30
Judy Dluzen
published
2.22
Jill Salajka
published
1.90
Andrea RAY
published 2.5
Dan Wellisch
published
Linda Epstein
published
Mary Jo Scarpelli
published
Maryanne Petritis
published
Muge Parmaksiz
published
Pam Cohen
published
Pamela Perl
published
Patricia Nelson
published
Rachel Lodro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Lodro + Andrea RAY2642% games−0.1% vs expected
Mary Therese Lee + Ayano Nakamura181453% games−0.5% vs expected
Linda Epstein + Laura Munitz Johnson6541% games−11.6% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Gail Wilson4256% gamesnot enough data
Judy Dluzen + Tara Snow2345% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Trager + Susan Thornquist044 matchesnot enough data
Carol Zorn + Mary Jo Scarpelli123 matchesnot enough data
Judy Dluzen + Jill Salajka033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Elizabeth Kobak
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Ayano Nakamura
331W–128L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
Mary Therese Lee
212W–126L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
Jill Siegel
84W–79L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Sharon Trager
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
Justin Booms
101W–55L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Lesley Seeger
39W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Joon Sung
91W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Susan Thornquist
52W–81L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Gail Wilson
25W–44L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Cowgill
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Michael Wellems
39W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Vijaykumar Patel
32W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Laura Munitz Johnson
38W–59L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Mandar Bankhele
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carol Zorn
30W–49L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Daione Mitchell
96W–84L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Tara Snow
33W–43L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Jean Niemi
41W–43L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Judy Dluzen
16W–61L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.30
Jill Salajka
12W–25L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Andrea RAY
2W–20L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Dan Wellisch
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Epstein
29W–34L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jo Scarpelli
58W–68L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maryanne Petritis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Muge Parmaksiz
10W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Cohen
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Perl
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Nelson
86W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Lodro
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.