Teams

Ltc/Alvarez/Loren

2024 Broward Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-13vs Sunrise/BaptisteWon 10
W#3 DoublesNena Rivas / Loreto Carvajal vs Barbara Mariani / Abrella Lacey7-5, 6-2
2024-02-21vs HeronBay/BastiasSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAna Murray vs Cheri Tishman6-1, 7-5
L#4 DoublesNena Rivas / Loreto Carvajal vs Monica Rosenberg / Maria Rendon2-6, 1-6
2024-02-14vs Midtown/MontserratLost 02
L#1 SinglesAna Murray vs MARIANA SILVA3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNena Rivas / Loreto Carvajal vs Maria Alejandra Sempe / Geraldine Fuentes2-6, 1-6
2024-01-31vs Wrc/LuzLost 01
L#3 DoublesNena Rivas / Loreto Carvajal vs Valeria Cisneros / Elizabeth Donalisio4-6, 4-6
2024-01-24vs Jetc/RogersonWon 10
W#4 DoublesLoreto Carvajal / Nena Rivas vs Diane Rogerson / Andrea Katz6-1, 6-2
2024-01-17vs Weston Hills/HernandezWon 10
W#4 DoublesNena Rivas / Loreto Carvajal vs Angella Lewis / Jessika Bolin6-0, 6-2
2024-01-10vs Florida/Contreras/40&Over3.5WWon 10
W#1 SinglesAna Murray vs Camille Aponte6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Gabriela Alvarez
published
3.46
Davina Cancelliere
published 3.5
3.43
Ana Murray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Beril Karacadag
published 3.5
3.29
Daniela Romay
published 3.5
3.28
Pamela Corzo
published
3.23
Nena Rivas
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Jaimi Hinkle
published
3.17
Marie Ferrigno
published
3.09
Robin Hayden
published
3.07
Maria Elena Rojas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Elena Rojas + Davina Cancelliere5455% games+6.9% vs expected
Marie Ferrigno + Robin Hayden224 matchesnot enough data
Beril Karacadag + Davina Cancelliere213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabriela Alvarez
25W–12L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Davina Cancelliere
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Ana Murray
112W–103L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Beril Karacadag
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Daniela Romay
29W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Pamela Corzo
20W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Nena Rivas
94W–112L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Jaimi Hinkle
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Marie Ferrigno
59W–73L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Robin Hayden
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Maria Elena Rojas
11W–23L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.