Teams

Cook Double Trouble

2023 One Doubles-Winter · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-03-07vs Kocian/AbramsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Cook / Chanda Kunz vs Noel Abrams / Maya Kocian3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Nguyen With Love7070245
2Kocian/Abrams6161237
3Fehrenbach-High Strung Doubles5252542
4McCarthy4343859
5Stockstad34341068
6Britt-Baker25251168
7Lee/Filomeo16161162
8Cook Double Trouble07071484

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Chanda Kunz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Karen Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chanda Kunz
69W–117L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Karen Cook
24W–116L career · 1 line in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.