Teams

Beerman - N. Escowitz

2025 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-25vs Beerman - R. EspitiaLost 01
L#1 DoublesZee Rodriguez / Rosa Jean vs Regina Espitia / Ginger Davis1-6, 3-6
2025-03-11vs WH City Raquettes - G. TardyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Chevalier / Rosa Jean vs Karen Evans / Ann Rainer2-6, 3-6
2025-02-11vs LCC 3.0 - A. ClarkWon 32
L#1 DoublesCara Geswelli / Heather Padgett vs Lauren Lloyd / Caroline Miller2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesRICHELE FLOYD vs Lauren Albaum6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNicole Escowitz / Zee Rodriguez vs Ashley Bailey / Amy Evans3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Chevalier vs Jen Lay0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrandy Noel / Sara Thompson vs Leah Grieger / Donna Mcwilliams6-4, 6-3
2025-02-04vs WH City Raquettes - G. TardyLost 01
L#3 DoublesZee Rodriguez / Rosa Jean vs Danielle Miller / Debra Summers4-6, 3-6
2025-01-14vs CCWH - J. CoconatoLost 01
L#2 DoublesNyrka Riskin / Rosa Jean vs Courtney McCrystal / Laura Carroll0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Heather Padgett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Cara Geswelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
RICHELE FLOYD
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.77
Zee Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Brandy Noel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Jennifer Chevalier
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.55
Stephanie Barron
published
2.42
Nicole Escowitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Rosa Jean
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nicole Noel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Escowitz + Cara Geswelli5259% games+4.4% vs expected
Zee Rodriguez + Heather Padgett224 matchesnot enough data
Cara Geswelli + Heather Padgett224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heather Padgett
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Cara Geswelli
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
RICHELE FLOYD
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
Zee Rodriguez
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Brandy Noel
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Jennifer Chevalier
10W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
Stephanie Barron
6W–23L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Nicole Escowitz
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%74%26%
2.42
Rosa Jean
28W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Nicole Noel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.