Teams

IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO CW7.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 7.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Maribel Barajas
published
3.69
Lynn Ventura
published
3.67
Laura Manelia
published
3.62
Rachel Chang
published
3.59
JoAnn Clark
published
3.55
Tracy Dennis
published
3.45
Stacey Word
published
3.39
Gina Chen
published
3.36
Monica Ravanello
published
3.35
Elizabeth Tong
published
3.35
Kay Johnson
published
3.30
Gloria Spencer
published
3.30
Anne Thurston
published 3.5
3.24
Courtney Bock
published 3.5
3.19
Magaly Otero
published
3.18
Lory Morar
published
3.15
Pamela Gourley
published
3.14
Nancy Orellana
published
3.10
Azita Asefi
published 3.5
3.09
Kimberly Thoma
published
Valerie Blanchard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lory Morar + Gloria Spencer4446% games−2.8% vs expected
Tracy Dennis + Elizabeth Tong404 matchesnot enough data
Magaly Otero + Kimberly Thoma213 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Word + Rachel Chang033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Tong + Monica Ravanello123 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Spencer + Monica Ravanello123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maribel Barajas
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
Lynn Ventura
18W–13L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Laura Manelia
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Rachel Chang
3W–25L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
JoAnn Clark
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
Tracy Dennis
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
Stacey Word
5W–19L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
Gina Chen
27W–21L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.39
Monica Ravanello
26W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Elizabeth Tong
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Kay Johnson
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Gloria Spencer
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Anne Thurston
25W–23L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Courtney Bock
23W–22L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Magaly Otero
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Lory Morar
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Pamela Gourley
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Nancy Orellana
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Azita Asefi
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Kimberly Thoma
17W–20L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.09
Valerie Blanchard
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.