Teams

Team 3 Crenshaw

2025 NOVA Mixed 55 & Over · NOVA Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-24vs Team 1 FDPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Kathleen Leary vs Qun Bi / Kai Yu0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEyad Abuhamda / Vicky Bach vs Sarah Zhou / Ming Wei6-7, 4-2
2025-08-22vs Team 2 MillerWon 21
W#1 DoublesEyad Abuhamda / Vicky Bach vs Lauren Robertson / Ken Pilkenton6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Jennifer Miles vs Sachi Pilkenton / JAMES SAUERS6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRon Haimowitz / Kathleen Leary vs Yuri Miller / Philip Stromer6-3, 6-2
2025-08-15vs Team 1 FDPWon 10
W#1 DoublesEyad Abuhamda / Vicky Bach vs Vincent Pang / Qun Bi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-10vs Team 2 MillerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Michele Brookhart vs Lauren Robertson / Stephen McMillin0-6, 3-6
2025-08-03vs Team 1 FDPLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Kathleen Leary vs Jun Chang / Shelley Que7-6, 3-2
L#2 DoublesEyad Abuhamda / Vicky Bach vs Lihang Ren / Frank Wang5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichele Brookhart / Ron Haimowitz vs Na Yu / Michael Chen4-6, 3-4
2025-08-01vs Team 2 MillerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Kathleen Leary vs Pilar Stack / Stephen McMillin6-7, 3-6
2025-07-25vs Team 1 FDPLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Vicky Bach vs Kai Yu / Lihang Ren6-7, 1-3
2025-07-20vs Team 2 MillerLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichele Brookhart / Albert Crenshaw vs Sachi Pilkenton / Stephen McMillin3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Eyad Abuhamda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.31
Kathleen Leary
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Albert Crenshaw
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.69
Jennifer Miles
published
2.68
Michele Brookhart
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Julie Zalkind
published
Vicky Bach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Albert Crenshaw + Kathleen Leary2543% gamesnot enough data
Albert Crenshaw + Michele Brookhart033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eyad Abuhamda
141W–95L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Kathleen Leary
160W–190L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Albert Crenshaw
54W–159L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jennifer Miles
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Michele Brookhart
27W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Christopher Damboise
5W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Julie Zalkind
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicky Bach
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.