Teams

BHSC Ballievers-Weck

2025 Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Raffinan / Amy Nolasco vs Harris Haynie / Heather McNulty Haynie4-6, 2-6
2025-05-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesLea Doise / Thomas Weck vs Donald Polifka / Tammy Hertel6-4, 6-4
2025-04-27vs Keswick-WatersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLinda Walker / Raymond Moreland vs Harris Haynie / Heather McNulty Haynie4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTodd Sechser / Amy Nolasco vs Samuel Hewitt / Andrea Gavin6-1, 6-2
2025-04-13vs Keswick-WatersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesThomas Weck / Lea Doise vs Erin Waters / Craig Ellis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMark Raffinan / Jennie Chiu vs Amit Shahane / Janie Shrader6-4, 6-1
2025-04-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Nolasco / Mark Raffinan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Weck / Linda Walker vs Donald Polifka / CAROLYN WARD1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Reid Phillips
published
4.41
Linda Walker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Todd Sechser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Nolasco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Raymond Moreland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Mark Raffinan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Wescott Blemker
published
4.06
Lauren Suggs
published
4.04
Thomas Weck
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
4.01
Robert Cueva
published
Jennie Chiu
published
Lea Doise
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reid Phillips
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Linda Walker
48W–35L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
Todd Sechser
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Amy Nolasco
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Moreland
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Mark Raffinan
72W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
Wescott Blemker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
Lauren Suggs
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Thomas Weck
69W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.04
Robert Cueva
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
Jennie Chiu
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lea Doise
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.