Teams

women

2025 Fall Adult League · Refund

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MAUI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Refund
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1women000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
3.91
Princess Ramos
published
3.65
Gage Beerer
published 4
3.59
Juliana Massenburg
published
3.58
Kandy Grantz
published 4
3.57
Marisa Fujimoto
published 4
3.47
Eveline Wunder
published 3.5
3.42
Ellen Huss
published 4
3.38
Lori Tanaka
published 3.5
2.77
Heidi Thorson
published 3
Roya Aryaee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Princess Ramos + Marisa Fujimoto5165% games+12.8% vs expected
Kandy Grantz + Juliana Massenburg5256% games+10.6% vs expected
Roya Aryaee + Gage Beerer3254% games+4.9% vs expected
Gage Beerer + Marisa Fujimoto4353% games−3.0% vs expected
Kandy Grantz + Gage Beerer7552% games−3.1% vs expected
Lori Tanaka + Marisa Fujimoto131651% games−3.5% vs expected
Gage Beerer + Lori Tanaka0741% games−8.9% vs expected
Kandy Grantz + Lori Tanaka134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Flam Sharp
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Princess Ramos
27W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Gage Beerer
83W–102L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Juliana Massenburg
37W–35L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Kandy Grantz
76W–65L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Marisa Fujimoto
119W–93L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Eveline Wunder
61W–50L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
4
Ellen Huss
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Lori Tanaka
87W–111L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3
Heidi Thorson
26W–37L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Roya Aryaee
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.