Teams

World Tennis Club - Lavery

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-09vs Marco YMCA - WashakLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Kerxton / Debra Logue vs Rachel Schenk / Julie Cologero4-6, 2-6
2023-05-02vs Pelican Marsh - BargerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLorrie Lavery / Debra Logue vs Nancy Krueger / Marie Shoaf4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs Melody Miller6-3, 6-2
2023-04-25vs Quail Creek - K. HoleLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Logue / Cynthia Daly vs Karen Hole / Tracy Maurer4-6, 2-6
2023-04-18vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs Jae Marie Fry1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs Maria Piermani6-0, 6-1
2023-04-04vs Marco YMCA - WashakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebra Logue / Mara Mazza vs Ann Heinauer / Julie Cologero4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs Jennifer Bonfitto6-1, 6-2
2023-03-28vs Pelican Marsh - BargerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebra Logue / Carolyn Romano vs Marie Shoaf / Kristine Laterra1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs Emily Eldredge6-4, 7-5
2023-03-21vs Quail Creek - K. HoleWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs Mariya Rebreeva6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
3.90
Debra Logue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Carolyn Romano
published 4
3.79
Carol Polipnick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.61
Deb Danaher
published 4
3.60
Denna Saidnawey
published 4
3.37
Mara Mazza
published
3.35
Lorrie Lavery
published
Jill Kerxton
published
Jill Shaw
published
Marie Wilson
published
Regina Gracie
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kimberly DiStefano
162W–61L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Debra Logue
162W–90L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Carolyn Romano
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Carol Polipnick
240W–112L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Deb Danaher
81W–50L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
4
Denna Saidnawey
28W–43L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Mara Mazza
25W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Lorrie Lavery
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Jill Kerxton
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Shaw
15W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marie Wilson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Regina Gracie
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.