Teams

Vachon/Chattanooga

2024 Combo 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 6.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-29vs Hullender/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesWayne Albergotti / Patrick Urey vs Jordan Wells / Santiago Angel6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Davis / Glen Urey vs Douglas McDowell / My Le6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Higgins / Lee Carroll vs Cory Phillips / Justin Shoemaker7-6, 6-3
2024-09-21vs Hullender/ChattanoogaWon 21
L#1 DoublesWayne Albergotti / Reggie Vachon vs Jordan Wells / Douglas McDowell2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWesley Alexander / Lee Carroll vs My Le / Andrew Gura7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Davis / Patrick Urey vs Cory Phillips / David Gardner6-1, 6-1
2024-09-15vs Hullender/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesWayne Albergotti / Reggie Vachon vs Andrew Gura / My Le6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesScott Higgins / Lee Carroll vs Cory Phillips / David Gardner6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWesley Alexander / Patrick Urey vs Santiago Angel / Justin Shoemaker6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Patrick Urey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Wayne Albergotti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Scott Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Reggie Vachon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Wesley Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Glen Urey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Lee Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reggie Vachon + Wayne Albergotti314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Urey
36W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Wayne Albergotti
16W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
Scott Higgins
44W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
Reggie Vachon
13W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
Wesley Alexander
5W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Glen Urey
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Lee Carroll
15W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.