Teams

GSTL55/Pendleton/Kingston

2025 Combo 55 & Over- GSTL · Adult WOMEN - 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-10vs GSTL55/Leroux/SurfLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeborah Dempsey / Faith Bowling vs Lucy OHare / Patti Bridgeman7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTonya Fitzgerald / Lila Diefenderfer vs Cheryl Rex / Lisa Leroux1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Pendleton / Cindy Trumbower vs Pamela Helsel / Susan Brady4-6, 5-7
2025-09-09vs GSTL55/Leroux/SurfLost 12
W#1 DoublesTonya Fitzgerald / Kay Gossett vs Shannon Fries / Josielou Stevens7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDayle Oakley / Anh Dao Sebastian vs Cheryl Rex / Lisa Leroux2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDanuta Gabriel / Katherine Helton vs Gina Vetrino / Barbara Meyer3-6, 4-6
2025-09-03vs GSTL55/Walsh/WachesawWon 21
W#1 DoublesFaith Bowling / Deborah Dempsey vs Jeanne Mize / Susan Chittick6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWendy Weikel / Renee Nisbet vs Megan Mcdonald / Cherie Gerstmyer6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKay Gossett / Judith Jackson vs Nancy Adamson / Jennifer Walsh6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-20vs GSTL55/Leroux/SurfLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeborah Dempsey / Faith Bowling vs Laura Core / Lisa Leroux6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTonya Fitzgerald / Diana Pendleton vs Cheryl Rex / Lauren Godwin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Trumbower / Anh Dao Sebastian vs Gina Vetrino / Barbara Meyer7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-13vs GSTL55/Walsh/WachesawWon 21
L#1 DoublesTonya Fitzgerald / Renee Nisbet vs Jeanne Mize / Megan Mcdonald4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Pendleton / Wendy Weikel vs Sloan Derrick / Kim Gordon6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFaith Bowling / Lila Diefenderfer vs Maureen Beckner / Bonnie Casey6-1, 6-0
2025-07-23vs GSTL55/Walsh/WachesawWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Dempsey / Faith Bowling vs Jeannine Siembida / Kimberly Leatherwood6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTonya Fitzgerald / Robin Brooks vs Jennifer Walsh / Sloan Derrick6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWendy Weikel / Anh Dao Sebastian vs Cheryl Haugh / Susan Chittick6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult WOMEN - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Deborah Dempsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Tonya Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Faith Bowling
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.88
Renee Nisbet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Wendy Weikel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Anh Dao Sebastian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cindy Trumbower
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Danuta Gabriel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Diana Pendleton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Dayle Oakley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Smedley
published
Katherine Helton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kay Gossett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lila Diefenderfer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Robin Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Helton + Diana Pendleton3257% games+3.9% vs expected
Deborah Dempsey + Faith Bowling404 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Helton + Danuta Gabriel044 matchesnot enough data
Diana Pendleton + Wendy Weikel224 matchesnot enough data
Kay Gossett + Dayle Oakley123 matchesnot enough data
Lila Diefenderfer + Cindy Trumbower213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Smedley + Diana Pendleton213 matchesnot enough data
Diana Pendleton + Cindy Trumbower123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Dempsey
24W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Tonya Fitzgerald
41W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Faith Bowling
15W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Renee Nisbet
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Wendy Weikel
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Anh Dao Sebastian
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Trumbower
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Danuta Gabriel
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Diana Pendleton
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dayle Oakley
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Karen Smedley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Helton
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kay Gossett
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lila Diefenderfer
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Brooks
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.