Teams

BP/Bruning-Chastain

2023 COTA USTA Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women - Spring · 3.5 weekday women

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 weekday women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Karen Stonecipher
published
3.20
Denise Fulton
published 3.5
3.14
3.12
Peggy Sullivan
published
3.12
Constance Ondo
published 3.5
3.11
Helen Minor
published
3.01
Judy Bruning
published
2.91
Heidi Ehrenreich
published
2.88
Betsey Chastain
published 3
2.87
Linda Pickering
published
2.83
Anne McCollum
published 3.5
2.78
Gigi Dykes
published
Margaret Peterson
published
Susan Banister
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gigi Dykes + Anne McCollum134 matchesnot enough data
Denise Fulton + Judy Bruning123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Stonecipher
24W–25L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Denise Fulton
41W–56L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Katherine Gail Hawkins
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Peggy Sullivan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Constance Ondo
9W–24L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Helen Minor
21W–17L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
Judy Bruning
14W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
Heidi Ehrenreich
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Betsey Chastain
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Linda Pickering
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
3.5
Anne McCollum
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.83
Gigi Dykes
10W–24L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.78
Margaret Peterson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Banister
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.