Teams

FOOTHILLS TandS 40AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-11vs CUBBERLEY 40AW3.5B-DTSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSabrina Dong vs Hyeyun Jeong3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Schmidt / Janice Shapiro vs Marsha Heimbecker / Ashley Unyoung Kim6-0, 6-1
2025-01-14vs CUBBERLEY 40AW3.5B-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesDee Miller / Kay Yonemoto vs Ashley Unyoung Kim / Xuan Wei4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Lisa Talbot
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Carole Donnelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Jeanette Pruzan
published
3.27
Sarah Chai
published
3.26
Jennifer Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dee Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Carol Giraudo
published 3.5
3.19
Kay Yonemoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Janice Shapiro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Karen Douglas
published
3.07
Julia Martino
published
2.84
Sabrina Dong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.72
Carole Borie
published 3
2.72
Leah Caldarone
published
Pamela Gullard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Yonemoto + Carol Giraudo4947% games+1.4% vs expected
Carole Donnelly + Sarah Chai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Talbot
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Carole Donnelly
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Jeanette Pruzan
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Sarah Chai
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennifer Schmidt
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Dee Miller
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carol Giraudo
9W–25L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kay Yonemoto
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Janice Shapiro
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Karen Douglas
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Julia Martino
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Sabrina Dong
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%1%99%
2.84
3
Carole Borie
11W–20L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Leah Caldarone
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Pamela Gullard
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.