Teams

Scarborough

2026 Winter Combo · 2026 Winter Combo 5.5 WOMEN Wednesday

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OHIO VALLEY

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-06vs New AlbanyWon 20
W#1 DoublesTara Gittins / Elisa Siesel vs Irene Larsen / Leslie Tanchevski4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Feasel / Sarah Martie vs Yvonne Kalucis / Mary Ann Petrie6-1, 6-3
2026-04-29vs ElysiumWon 20
W#1 DoublesTara Gittins / Elisa Siesel vs Jennifer Houser / Jena Holderman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Carey / Andrea Wiltrout vs Sarah Martin / Helen Smith6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-22vs OlympicWon 30
W#1 DoublesTara Gittins / Elisa Siesel vs Arica Worth / Rachel Vranich6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Feasel / Sarah Martie vs Lisa Janszen / Annie Dietzen6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCheryl Carey / Kendra Vuticevski vs Jennifer Burns / Jenny Wooster-McBride6-2, 6-1
2026-04-15vs Racquet Club 1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTara Gittins / Elisa Siesel vs Allison Hargrove / Jamie Henn1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Martie / Lisa Rauck vs Natalie Musser / Simran Parmar0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJennifer Fuller / Andrea Wiltrout vs Lauren Bach / Melissa Braun5-7, 2-6
2026-04-08vs Racquet Club 2Split 11
W#1 DoublesTara Gittins / Kendra Vuticevski vs Joanna Franks / Tansel Yilmazer2-6, 5-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Beran / Elisa Siesel vs Jamie McCurdy / Tracy Steinbrenner6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-25vs New AlbanyWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Martie / Kathy Navarro vs Michele Henry / Tami Judge6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fuller / Andrea Wiltrout vs Irene Larsen / Ellen Gourley5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-04vs ElysiumLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Rauck / Kathy Navarro vs Sarah Martin / Jennifer Lutz6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMara Ackermann Ziminski / Kendra Vuticevski vs Meredith Garth / Amanda Shenton3-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesAndrea Wiltrout / Ann Zallocco vs Kara Casey / Jena Holderman3-6, 3-6
2026-02-11vs OlympicWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Feasel / Kathy Navarro vs Ellen Bloch / Annie Dietzen6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Beran / Sarah Sylvester vs Jodi Marmion / Jenny Wooster-McBride5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Carey / Elisa Siesel vs Lisa Janszen / Vonnie Voorhis6-0, 6-4
2026-02-04vs Racquet Club 1Won 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Fuller / Elisa Siesel vs Jamie Henn / Allison Hargrove0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTara Gittins / Kathy Navarro vs Melissa Braun / Jill Gross6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Carey / Kendra Vuticevski vs Heather Chiles / Angela Lanctot4-6, 6-5, 1-0
2026-01-28vs Racquet Club 2Won 21
W#1 DoublesTara Gittins / Kathy Navarro vs Laura Elsrod / Jamie McCurdy6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Rauck / Sarah Sylvester vs Tansel Yilmazer / Danielle English7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndrea Wiltrout / Cheryl Carey vs Yumi Willard / Jessica Karam1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Winter Combo 5.5 WOMEN Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Tara Gittins
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
2.81
Charlotte Beran
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.76
Cheryl Carey
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.74
Mara Ackermann Ziminski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.68
Lisa Rauck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Lindsey Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Sarah Feasel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Sarah Martie
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.36
Elisa Siesel
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.26
Kendra Vuticevski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.89
Andrea Wiltrout
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Rauck + Sarah Feasel4158% games+6.0% vs expected
Tara Gittins + Mara Ackermann Ziminski4256% games+5.6% vs expected
Cheryl Carey + Tara Gittins2355% games+2.4% vs expected
Tara Gittins + Charlotte Beran7648% games−0.6% vs expected
Mara Ackermann Ziminski + Charlotte Beran2538% games−1.2% vs expected
Cheryl Carey + Andrea Wiltrout2442% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Martie + Sarah Feasel2443% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Carey + Kendra Vuticevski314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tara Gittins
129W–102L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Charlotte Beran
79W–53L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Cheryl Carey
50W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Mara Ackermann Ziminski
60W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Lisa Rauck
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
Lindsey Kelley
32W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.66
Sarah Feasel
34W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
Sarah Martie
12W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
Elisa Siesel
33W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Kendra Vuticevski
31W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Andrea Wiltrout
9W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.