Teams

Hawkstone HCC - Westerburg

2022 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-16vs HCC - HwangLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Severance / Robert Tangeman vs Song Lai / Changburm Cho6-7, 6-7
2022-12-09vs ALACHUA/Schafer/Men/6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Lipori / Pranav Gupta vs Boris Kuchuk / Steve Pratscher1-6, 0-6
2022-12-05vs DB - DemopoulosSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPranav Gupta / Paul Lipori vs George Demopoulos / Muhammad Ali6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRobert Tangeman / Eduardo Rondon vs DALTON IEIRI / Scott Travis5-7, 2-6
2022-12-02vs WS - SpinkWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Lipori / Pranav Gupta vs Josh Spink / Derek Farnsworth6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Tangeman / Jim Severance vs Jerome Valencia / Timothy Ferguson6-1, 7-5
2022-10-28vs WS - SpinkWon 10
W#1 DoublesPranav Gupta / Paul Lipori vs Thomas Duffaut / Jorge Torres-Vazquez6-1, 6-3
2022-10-21vs DB - DemopoulosWon 20
W#1 DoublesPranav Gupta / Paul Lipori vs Muhammad Ali / Marc Schnoll6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoseph Cox IV / Jim Severance vs Scott Travis / James Araujo7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Keith Myers
published
3.44
Pranav Gupta
published
3.31
Jim Severance
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Kevin Smith
published
3.10
Paul Lipori
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Robert Tangeman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
JASON BROMIRSKI
published 3
John Cornell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Tangeman + Paul Lipori6266% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keith Myers
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Pranav Gupta
23W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Jim Severance
29W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Kevin Smith
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Paul Lipori
99W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Robert Tangeman
146W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
JASON BROMIRSKI
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Cornell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.