Teams

Eccles Tennis Center-Dalpe

2023 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 4.0M

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-16vs Eccles Tennis Center-D'agostiniLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesPrema Zipp / Jerad Amundsen vs Benjamin Jagolinzer / Nicholas Mihalyi3-6, 2-6
W#2 Male DoublesPrema Zipp / Jerad Amundsen vs Colby Pomeroy / Nicholas Geer6-4, 6-1
2023-12-02vs Wasatch Hills-VorasaneWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesPrema Zipp / Jerad Amundsen vs Steven Vorasane / Matthew McDonald6-2, 6-5
2023-11-18vs Eccles Tennis Center-D'agostiniLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesPrema Zipp / Jerad Amundsen vs Brian Crowe / CHRISTOPHER HO0-6, 4-6
L#1 Male DoublesJerad Amundsen / Alex Spencer vs Scott Flemming / Brady Rasmussen6-7, 1-6
2023-11-04vs Wasatch Hills-VorasaneWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesPrema Zipp / Jerad Amundsen vs Steven Vorasane / Corey Bankhead6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Matthew Wisdom
published
3.57
Alex Dalpe
published 4
3.56
Jerad Amundsen
usually #2 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Prema Zipp
published
3.32
Alex Spencer
published 4
3.24
Ted Staros
usually #3 Male Doubles 80%, also #1 Male Doubles 20% · published 3.5
John Posadas
published
Justin Deputy
published
William Roeca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Roeca + Prema Zipp3343% games+5.7% vs expected
Justin Deputy + Matthew Wisdom4453% games+0.7% vs expected
Prema Zipp + Jerad Amundsen4442% games−6.4% vs expected
Jerad Amundsen + Alex Spencer3247% gamesnot enough data
William Roeca + Alex Dalpe224 matchesnot enough data
William Roeca + Jerad Amundsen123 matchesnot enough data
Justin Deputy + Prema Zipp123 matchesnot enough data
Alex Dalpe + John Posadas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Wisdom
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alex Dalpe
44W–72L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Jerad Amundsen
95W–118L career · 6 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Prema Zipp
27W–54L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.46
4
Alex Spencer
21W–28L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.32
3.5
Ted Staros
52W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
John Posadas
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Justin Deputy
70W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Roeca
29W–40L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.