Teams

Westfield 2

2025 Tri-Level Men · 4.0-3.5-3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NEW JERSEY REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-10vs Westfield 1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesIgor Shames / Alan Howard vs Jonathan Moses / Anthony Poerio4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Rinaldi / Vien Bouarapha vs Matias Diez / Curtis Tao2-6, 4-6
2025-05-09vs Westfield 1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChristian Bonn / Alan Howard vs Anthony Poerio / Jeffrey Moore0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPrashant Gokhale / James Gould vs Donatas Augylius / LEONARDO RINALDI3-6, 2-6
2025-05-02vs Westfield 1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJesse Raley / William Lester vs SungWoo Kahng / Anthony Poerio6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVien Bouarapha / Christian Bonn vs Stefan Dombrowski / Richard Liu3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKwaku Adjei-Bohyen / Jared McClain vs Donatas Augylius / Burak Topcuoglu1-6, 1-6
2025-04-25vs Westfield 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Lester / Jesse Raley vs Bruno Maguino / Alex Fiore7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJames Gould / Vien Bouarapha vs Aaron Daubert-Terrigno / Drew Lipshutz0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJared McClain / Ilya Furman vs Mario Castro Martinez / LEONARDO RINALDI0-6, 1-6
2025-04-11vs Westfield 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFrancois Fournier / William Lester vs Jonathan Moses / Anthony Poerio5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesVien Bouarapha / Rajiv Sethumadhavan vs Alex Fiore / Jeffrey Moore1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesIlya Furman / Vinayak Behl vs Donatas Augylius / Marc Benou1-6, 4-6
2025-04-04vs Westfield 1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Lester / Michael Kim vs MARIO ITURRALDE / Abhishek Vats2-6, 2-1
L#2 DoublesRyan Convery / Vien Bouarapha vs Urvish Barot / Aaron Daubert-Terrigno1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJames Gould / Prashant Gokhale vs Marc Benou / Mario Castro Martinez3-6, 4-6
2025-03-28vs Westfield 1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancois Fournier / Alan Howard vs Adam Marshall / SungWoo Kahng1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHang Fan / Rajiv Sethumadhavan vs Pankaj Sachdeva / Karthik Sankaralingam6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBruce Mizrach / Joseph Rinaldi vs Donatas Augylius / Farokh Vesuna1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0-3.5-3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Westfield 17016512124
2Westfield 20751635220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
William Lester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Francois Fournier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Igor Shames
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Rajiv Sethumadhavan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Alan Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Jesse Raley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Vinayak Behl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Hang Fan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Kwaku Adjei-Bohyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Bruce Mizrach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ilya Furman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
James Gould
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Christian Bonn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jared McClain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Rinaldi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Kim
published
Prashant Gokhale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Convery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vien Bouarapha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajiv Sethumadhavan + Vien Bouarapha404 matchesnot enough data
William Lester + Francois Fournier123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Lester
56W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Francois Fournier
58W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Igor Shames
16W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Rajiv Sethumadhavan
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Alan Howard
49W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Jesse Raley
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Vinayak Behl
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Hang Fan
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kwaku Adjei-Bohyen
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Bruce Mizrach
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Ilya Furman
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
James Gould
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3.5
Christian Bonn
21W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.62
Jared McClain
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Rinaldi
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Kim
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Prashant Gokhale
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Convery
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vien Bouarapha
20W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.