Teams

NWO 18&Over 3.0W Duckett/ Dillon-SVC

2022 NWO Adult 18 & Over Night · NWO Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-08-01vs NWO 18&Over 3.0W Snyder-FTWon 50
W#1 DoublesDenise Sottek / Brittany Burnett vs Paula Lauer / Christine Mathewson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMarci Cancic vs Linda Androvich6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Ann Roehl / Cheryl Daney vs Amy Snyder / Jennifer Zetocha6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHeather Ha Vo vs Tracey Brungard6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Hopkins / Kelly Links vs Debra Baltz / Michelle Dammeier6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesShari Duckett / Christina Tipping vs Julie Kreienkamp / Mitzi Mazzullo4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKate Krisjanis vs Diana Bushman6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Ann Roehl / Shelly Stamm vs Cassie Hartzell / Barbara Cleveland3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMarci Cancic vs Renee Reaume6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKelly Links / Cheryl Daney vs Jordan Sandretto / Staci Freeworth3-6, 2-6
2022-05-23vs NWO 18&Over 3.0W Cody-SCCWon 32
W#1 DoublesShari Duckett / Denise Sottek vs Lindsay Assenmacher / Andi Melvin6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrittany Burnett vs Lisa Krebs6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Ann Roehl / Christina Tipping vs Joanna Lewinski / Jessica Lankford7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHeather Ha Vo vs Allison Melching6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Links / Cheryl Daney vs Ashley Santacroce / Molly O'Connell3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NWO Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Brittany Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Denise Sottek
usually #1 Singles 54%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3.5
Christina Tipping
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.23
Kate Krisjanis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.14
Heather Ha Vo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Marci Cancic
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Shari Duckett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.61
Cheryl Daney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Kelly Links
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Ann Roehl
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Megan Hopkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shelly Stamm
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Ann Roehl + Shelly Stamm7754% games−3.1% vs expected
Megan Hopkins + Kelly Links4255% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Daney + Shelly Stamm4261% gamesnot enough data
Shari Duckett + Marci Cancic5164% gamesnot enough data
Brittany Burnett + Heather Ha Vo314 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Daney + Kelly Links134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Ann Roehl + Heather Ha Vo314 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Burnett + Christina Tipping303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brittany Burnett
98W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Denise Sottek
122W–82L career · 13 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Christina Tipping
39W–23L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kate Krisjanis
40W–47L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Heather Ha Vo
73W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Marci Cancic
69W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Shari Duckett
90W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Cheryl Daney
31W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61
Kelly Links
56W–70L career · 6 lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
2.57
Julie Ann Roehl
78W–76L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Megan Hopkins
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Shelly Stamm
31W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.