← Teams

CAC-Morales

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.79 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Ahmad Garakani
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
—
Rick Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Robert Ferek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.53
Roger Mickey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Neil Soiffer
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.28
Bruce Yang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Len Morales
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2024-05-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDavid Seideman / Neil Soiffer vs Jack Henry / James Hockley6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAhmad Garakani / Bruce Yang vs John Helmer III / Tim Leatherman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBruce Yang / David Seideman vs Jack Henry / James Hockley6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Ferek / Ahmad Garakani vs William Campbell / Mark Stromme4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Len Morales vs Donald Brenneman / Tim Leatherman6-1, 6-0
2024-05-14Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobert Ferek / Neil Soiffer vs Richard Crossley / Matt Thayer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTruc Ly / Bruce Yang vs Bill Lowblad / Christopher Gilmore6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLen Morales / David Seideman vs Frank Foti / James Horen6-0, 6-3
2024-05-10Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRobert Ferek / Ahmad Garakani vs Eric Cooley / Ted Carlson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLen Morales / Truc Ly vs Carlin Jackson / Tom Lonergan6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBruce Yang / Roger Mickey vs Bill Henderson / Floyd Grant4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-02Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Robert Ferek vs Christopher Gilmore / Alan Lave6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRoger Mickey / Ahmad Garakani vs Matt Thayer / Paul Stutzman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRick Collins / Truc Ly vs James Horen / Tom Stacy7-5, 6-1
2024-04-18Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / David Seideman vs Donald Brenneman / Jeffrey Krum7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRick Collins / David Koch vs Jack Henry / Alan Shiffer6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Ferek / Truc Ly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBruce Yang / David Seideman vs Perry Sides / Floyd Grant6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Ferek / Ahmad Garakani vs Eric Cooley / Steve Bolstad3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoger Mickey / Len Morales vs Bill Rhoades / Tom Lonergan6-3, 6-3
2024-03-28Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / David Seideman vs David Edwards / Bill Lowblad6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAhmad Garakani / Robert Ferek vs Greg Powell / James Horen6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLen Morales / Roger Mickey vs Larry Kaster / Tom Stacy6-3, 6-2
2024-03-21Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBruce Yang / David Seideman vs Steve Bolstad / Robert Fowler6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Ferek / Roger Mickey vs Eric Cooley / Jack Schunk6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLen Morales / Neil Soiffer vs Tom Lonergan / Carlin Jackson6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Ahmad Garakani
47W–39L career
not enough data
—
4
Rick Collins
14W–46L career
not enough data
—
4
Robert Ferek
75W–92L career
27%73%0%
3.53
3.5
Roger Mickey
9W–22L career
0%70%30%
3.53
4
Neil Soiffer
96W–138L career
44%56%0%
3.46
3.5
Bruce Yang
33W–74L career
1%98%1%
3.28
3.5
Len Morales
43W–69L career
8%92%0%
3.17

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.