Teams

PD40/Siegal/FTC

2026 STA Adult Combo 40 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs PD40/L.Graham/PTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Buen Abad / Stacie Watford vs Pamela Cody / Kay Zobrist4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesVontella Kennedy-James / Kathleen Stedman vs Betsy Graham / Denise Weeks6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Gunter / Haixia Xi vs Pamela Weinberg / Catherine Watkins6-2, 6-1
2026-08-12vs PD40/Pitiranggon/FTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesStacie Watford / Beth Gunter vs Tamera King / Brenda Echandy6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLorraine Tindal / Marlene Ward vs Ning Wharton / ALISON THOMPSON3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Anderson / Laura Buen Abad vs Haley Wightman / Ronelle van Heerden2-6, 4-6
2026-08-05vs PD40/L.Graham/PTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesOphillia Dominique / Teresa Cheng vs Raquel Lastimoso / Pamela Cody6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Buen Abad / Rebecca Anderson vs Katarzyna Timmons / Allison Turner2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRobin Siegal / Deborah Bailey vs Catherine Watkins / Pamela Weinberg7-5, 7-6
2026-07-22vs PD40/Pitiranggon/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Cheng / Robin Siegal vs Ning Wharton / Pat Pitiranggon2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLorraine Tindal / Ophillia Dominique vs Haley Wightman / Ronelle van Heerden1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRebecca Anderson / Melissa Ellerbe vs Helen Carroll / Brenda Echandy7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Beth Gunter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Melissa Ellerbe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Merryn Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Vontella Kennedy-James
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Stacie Watford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jennifer Darr
published
2.83
Kathleen Stedman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Marlene Ward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Robin Siegal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Haixia Xi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Laura Buen Abad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Ophillia Dominique
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Deborah Bailey
published 3
2.63
Teresa Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Lorraine Tindal
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.52
Kristen Perkins
published
Ruth Sigmon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ophillia Dominique + Lorraine Tindal3346% games+14.3% vs expected
Lorraine Tindal + Teresa Cheng5061% games+12.2% vs expected
Ophillia Dominique + Marlene Ward5158% gamesnot enough data
Ophillia Dominique + Melissa Ellerbe3350% gamesnot enough data
Laura Buen Abad + Robin Siegal3251% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Perkins + Robin Siegal1440% gamesnot enough data
Laura Buen Abad + Beth Gunter224 matchesnot enough data
Beth Gunter + Robin Siegal224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Gunter
27W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Melissa Ellerbe
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Merryn Weaver
19W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Vontella Kennedy-James
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.95
Stacie Watford
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Jennifer Darr
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Kathleen Stedman
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Marlene Ward
32W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
Robin Siegal
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Haixia Xi
35W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
Laura Buen Abad
15W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Ophillia Dominique
41W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.70
3
Deborah Bailey
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Teresa Cheng
28W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%17%83%
2.63
Lorraine Tindal
26W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
Kristen Perkins
13W–17L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Ruth Sigmon
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.