← Teams

PTC-McTague

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.06 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Paula Conway
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Thomas Croll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Hilary Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Paul Best
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.85
David Prescott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Maarten Schreuder
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Michael McTague
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Dave Sasaki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-03-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesThomas Croll / Lisa Bledsoe vs JAMES KYUNG / Jan Boyd6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPaul Best / Judy Friedman vs Shahin Ansari / Melanie DeSilva4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMolly Albright / Maarten Schreuder vs Susanne Cochran / Eli Lamb6-1, 6-0
2022-02-25Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesDavid Prescott / Susan Block vs Robert Burlingame / Jennie Burlingame6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDave Sasaki / Marianne ODoherty vs Jonathan Guinn / Yanchen Qi6-3, 6-4
2022-02-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDave Sasaki / Marianne ODoherty vs Erika Brehm / Chris Brehm6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Prescott / Heather Martin vs Mary Rudinsky / Larry Butrick6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMaarten Schreuder / Susan Block vs Sharon Place / William Place6-3, 7-5
2022-01-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMolly Albright / Michael McTague vs Karin Owens / Erik Bucher6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJudy Friedman / Maarten Schreuder vs Carol Glenn / Ryan Owens6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHilary Johnson / Thomas Croll vs JULIE GIBSON / PATRICK GOTTSCH6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMichael McTague / Lisa Bledsoe vs Janet Ha / Manoj Pandya6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHilary Johnson / Thomas Croll vs THAO VAN / Rajesh Vemuri4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Best / Heather Martin vs Johan Hong / Amy Mai6-3, 6-1
2022-01-16Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJudy Friedman / Paul Best vs Kay Hallmark / Gary Hallmark0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Bledsoe / Michael McTague vs Lisa Bowes / Ron Eiseman6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaula Conway / Thomas Croll vs Ellen Wood / Anthony Yazzolino6-0, 6-2
2022-01-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMichael McTague / Susan Block vs Jane King Ayers / Eric Ayers6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDave Sasaki / Judy Friedman vs Jennifer Weaver / Keith Ketterling3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaarten Schreuder / Lisa Bledsoe vs Jean Schnadig / Ian Schnadig4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-07Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMolly Albright / David Prescott vs Joshua Lewis / Julie LaMontagne6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarianne ODoherty / Paul Best vs Sarie Crothers / Mark Alan6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Block / Michael McTague vs Julia Plowman / Matthew Hilber6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Paula Conway
48W–75L career
5%95%0%
3.17
3
Thomas Croll
30W–28L career
0%86%14%
2.97
3
Hilary Johnson
68W–64L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Paul Best
46W–76L career
0%97%3%
2.86
3
David Prescott
44W–47L career
1%91%8%
2.85
3
Maarten Schreuder
14W–39L career
3%95%1%
2.75
3
Michael McTague
50W–87L career
18%82%0%
2.60
3
Dave Sasaki
21W–42L career
15%85%0%
2.60

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.