Teams

Marino - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-15vs Wallace - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Marino / Donald Russell vs Kenneth Wallace / Charlotte Stark3-6, 4-6
2022-02-08vs Bradford - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesZachary Schweigert / Jena Wise vs Michael Yager / Angela Stewart7-6, 6-4
2022-02-01vs Wallace - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJena Wise / Zachary Schweigert vs Janie Clark / Terry Thrash6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDawn Marino / Jeff Taylor vs Jacqueline Wallace / Cosme Barrios1-6, 4-6
2022-01-31vs Crooke - SHLLost 12
W#1 DoublesZachary Schweigert / Jena Wise vs Karlo Rivera / Ann Scott6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDawn Marino / Jeff Taylor vs Jonathan Garcia / Claudia Simmons3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Donald Russell vs Shaner Garner Crooke / Ken McCurdy3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-01-18vs Bradford - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesJena Wise / Zachary Schweigert vs Bonita Witkin / Brad Bradford7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDawn Marino / Jeff Taylor vs Angela Stewart / Michael Yager2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Donald Russell vs Renee Bradford / Brett Worley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-04vs Miller - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesZachary Schweigert / Jena Wise vs Christopher Brown / Erin Rhone0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jeff Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
3.59
Ryan Elliott
published
3.56
Tracey Mcclurd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Dawn Marino
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Jena Wise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Marco Fuentealba
published
Zachary Schweigert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Taylor + Dawn Marino033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Taylor
47W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Elizabeth Elliott
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
Ryan Elliott
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Tracey Mcclurd
63W–107L career · 2 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Dawn Marino
69W–111L career · 4 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jena Wise
38W–96L career · 5 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
Marco Fuentealba
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Zachary Schweigert
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.