← Teams

MV-Chennault

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Mary Chennault
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.67
Alex Harbell
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.29
Michael Kardas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Craig Mcreary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
—
Michele Waite
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
—
Roger Gwin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 0
—
Tony Chennault
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 0
Results8 ties
2018-12-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMax Anderson / Cindy Rushall vs Tony Tully / Michele O'Brien6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Kardas / Stephanie Jones vs Kathy Ramsey / David Bender6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJill Chapman / Alex Harbell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-11-10Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMary Chennault / Max Anderson vs Keisuke Komine / Dongju Won6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTony Chennault / Michele Waite vs Neil Soiffer / Kyoko Adcock6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRoger Gwin / Cindy Rushall vs Deepak Kumar / Flor Harrigan6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2018-11-04Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichael Kardas / Mary Chennault vs Deepak Selvanathan / Julie Hansen7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlex Harbell / Michele Waite vs Molly Odonnell / David Sefton6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCraig Mcreary / Cindy Rushall vs Diane di Vito / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti6-3, 6-0
2018-10-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMary Chennault / Roger Gwin vs Neil Soiffer / Chizuru Watanabe6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTony Chennault / Jill Chapman vs Yuya Fujii / Ashley Schneider6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlex Harbell / Michele Waite vs Flor Harrigan / Deepak Kumar3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2018-10-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCraig Mcreary / Jill Chapman vs Santhanakrishnan Balakrishnan / Tamara Justus6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael Kardas / Stephanie Jones vs Theresa Berry / Brady Berry6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRoger Gwin / Cindy Rushall vs Ajay Kumar Tippisetti / Shari Levelle7-6, 6-3
2018-10-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Mary Chennault vs Joe Warner / Suzanne DeLea6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTony Chennault / Jill Chapman vs Meshi Chavez / Sarah Lanigan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Harbell / Michele Waite vs Scott Reis / Carrie Engle7-5, 6-2
2018-09-29Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMary Chennault / Roger Gwin vs Joonie Kaneshige / Theresa Mallari7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJill Chapman / Tony Chennault vs Jennifer Andrieu / Matt Wheatley6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMax Anderson / Cindy Rushall vs Pamela Buckley / Vincent Scopacasa7-5, 6-2
2018-09-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Mary Chennault vs Kevin Hughes / Carrie Pelz7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTony Chennault / Jill Chapman vs Brian Hughes / Brenda Falson6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAlex Harbell / Lucia von Flotow vs Jonathan Payne / Sherri Sacconaghi6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mary Chennault
106W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.75
4
Alex Harbell
127W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.67
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Michael Kardas
27W–50L career
0%99%1%
3.29
0
Craig Mcreary
45W–43L career
not enough data
—
0
Michele Waite
50W–16L career
not enough data
—
0
Roger Gwin
45W–45L career
not enough data
—
0
Tony Chennault
37W–27L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.