Teams

Lagoon-Izer-3.5-Day-Spring-40

2023 Spring USTA 40 & Over Day League-Montgomery · 3.5 Day Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Day Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Diane Locke
published 3.5
3.50
Mary Brazell
published
3.32
Marissa Rozman
published
Gina Izer
published 3.5
3.25
Kaymarie Briddell
published
3.23
Debbie Olsen
published 3.5
3.23
Tonya Lee
published
3.14
Beth Crowe
published 3.5
3.10
Tammy Hayes
published
3.08
Wyvonne Johnson
published
2.98
Tina Ward
published
2.90
Conitha King
published 3
Kyeongsuk Oh
published
Linda Riffe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tonya Lee + Tina Ward5354% games+1.7% vs expected
Kaymarie Briddell + Beth Crowe2445% games−7.8% vs expected
Tammy Hayes + Tina Ward044 matchesnot enough data
Gina Izer + Debbie Olsen314 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Hayes + Tonya Lee033 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Olsen + Mary Brazell213 matchesnot enough data
Beth Crowe + Tina Ward303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Locke
61W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.57
Mary Brazell
23W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.50
Marissa Rozman
41W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.32
3.5
Gina Izer
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kaymarie Briddell
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debbie Olsen
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Tonya Lee
11W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Beth Crowe
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
Tammy Hayes
14W–26L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
Wyvonne Johnson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Tina Ward
40W–47L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Conitha King
27W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
Kyeongsuk Oh
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Riffe
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.