Teams

COTA/Coreen DeLamater

2026 COTA USTA Tri-level 18 & Over Women - Spring · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Flight II

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-25vs ATC/DonatelliSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTrudy Goeckel / Virginia Grimes vs Amanda Wilson / Laura Williams7-5, 5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShana Jones / Julianne Schmidt vs Allison Donatelli / Cali Brutz6-0, 6-2
2026-04-25vs COTA/Amberlee AboormarWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeanne Martin / Julianne Schmidt vs Katie Duvall / Angela Ryan6-2, 6-3
2026-04-18vs MCTC/Logan/MeltonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTrudy Goeckel / Susan Wilhelm vs Meghan Imrie / Erica Pancoast6-4, 3-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAngela Dean / Jeanne Martin vs Amanda Lomonaco / Claire Stamps5-7, 6-4, 1-6
2026-04-04vs OVP/Snyder SAT Tri 2Won 10
W#3 DoublesShana Jones / Julianne Schmidt vs Ella Cain / Debbie Snyder6-0, 6-0
2026-03-28vs ATC/DonatelliWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Dean / Jeanne Martin vs Cali Brutz / Allison Donatelli3-6, 6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Flight II have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Coreen Delamater
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Taylor Alexander
published
3.57
Jessica Muilenburg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Shelly Stratton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Amanda Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.27
Melissa Harshman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
Virginia Grimes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Trudy Goeckel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Teresa Gattiker
published
2.99
Shana Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Angela Dean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Jeanne Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Harshman + Trudy Goeckel7166% games+19.9% vs expected
Melissa Harshman + Shelly Stratton291060% games+7.1% vs expected
Jeanne Martin + Angela Dean10457% games+4.7% vs expected
Taylor Alexander + Coreen Delamater314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Patterson + Coreen Delamater134 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Alexander + Amanda Patterson213 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Patterson + Melissa Harshman213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Harshman + Angela Dean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Coreen Delamater
58W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Taylor Alexander
24W–12L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Jessica Muilenburg
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Shelly Stratton
33W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
4
Amanda Patterson
28W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Melissa Harshman
65W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Virginia Grimes
28W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Trudy Goeckel
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Teresa Gattiker
36W–26L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Shana Jones
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Angela Dean
36W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Jeanne Martin
39W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.