Teams

Day/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-16vs Tatum/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesSean Henneberger / Dusty Nelson vs Jean-Francois Lejeune / Muhammad Raza6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Moore / Barry Maynard vs Mark Coyne / Adam Bratton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJason Buchanan / Tyler Little vs James Wadlington / Keith Brower6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jack Stimac
published
3.36
Griffin Beard
published
3.30
Taylor Lackie
published
3.25
Dusty Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Barrett Day
published 3.5
3.18
Baker Williams
published 3.5
3.15
Ben Avant
published 3.5
3.10
Tyler Little
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Bryce Daves
published 3
2.98
Gregory Gaston
published
2.94
Blake Hankins
published 3
2.93
Sean Henneberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Marq Cobb
published
2.73
Barry Maynard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Henneberger + Bryce Daves224 matchesnot enough data
Jack Stimac + Griffin Beard213 matchesnot enough data
Sean Henneberger + Barrett Day213 matchesnot enough data
Dusty Nelson + Barrett Day303 matchesnot enough data
Bryce Daves + Barrett Day303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Stimac
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Griffin Beard
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Taylor Lackie
12W–11L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Dusty Nelson
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Barrett Day
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Baker Williams
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Ben Avant
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Tyler Little
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Bryce Daves
10W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Gregory Gaston
12W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Blake Hankins
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Sean Henneberger
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Marq Cobb
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.82
3
Barry Maynard
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.