Teams

Western

2026 OH OV SUMMER Daytime A18&O W Cincinnati · 2026 Summer Day A 18&O 3.5W Cincinnati

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-16vs Camargo PlatinumLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny Middendorf / Meghan Sullivan vs Blake Thompson / Danielle Abdo6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKirsten Whittemore vs Betsy Leonidas1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Holloway / Sheila James vs Jenna Joseph / Gina Lee2-6, 1-6
2026-06-25vs Five Seasons KYLost 12
L#1 DoublesShadia Bucciarelli / Meghan Sullivan vs Kathryn Barrott / Becky Young2-6, 6-3, 5-2
W#1 SinglesKirsten Whittemore vs Lori Warden6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonna Holloway / Karen Salem vs Michele Wisher / Gloria Carpenter4-6, 3-6
2026-06-11vs Queen City BlueLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenny Middendorf / Shadia Bucciarelli vs Jennifer Dahm / Ozlem Ladd3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMeghan Sullivan vs Stacy Hanna0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Nienaber / Donna Holloway vs Tracey DiFalco / Nancy Bowman4-6, 4-6
2026-06-04vs HarpersLost 12
W#1 DoublesNATALIA GARCIA / Kirsten Whittemore vs Mandy Longbottom / Stacy Williams6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSheila James vs Olesya Gulerman2-6, 5-7, 0-3
L#2 DoublesBrenda Nienaber / Meghan Sullivan vs Kim Carroll / Angela Buckley1-6, 3-6
2026-05-21vs LifetimeLost 03
L#1 DoublesNATALIA GARCIA / Brenda Nienaber vs Kathleen Hauck / Wendy Mitchell3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesShadia Bucciarelli vs Terri Barbush6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Holloway / Sheila James vs Pamela Moore Carney / Lynn Sovec2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Summer Day A 18&O 3.5W Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Kirsten Whittemore
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Brenda Nienaber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Sheila James
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.06
Meghan Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Shadia Bucciarelli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.03
Donna Holloway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Middendorf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Salem
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
NATALIA GARCIA
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirsten Whittemore
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.66
3.5
Brenda Nienaber
1W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Sheila James
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Meghan Sullivan
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Shadia Bucciarelli
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Donna Holloway
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Jenny Middendorf
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Salem
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
NATALIA GARCIA
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.