Teams

Clark, Jane

2025 Adult Mid Tri-Level 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 · Women 3.5,4.0,4.5 Tri Level

15 players · average NTRP 4.33 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-24vs Murphy, SusanLost 03
L#1 DoublesRenetta Ramsdell / Amie Schick vs Jennifer VanMeter / Sarah Taber4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Keefer / Ruth Knox vs Jennifer Hudson / Christy Mayo4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAbbie Dougherty / Jennifer Haake vs Christie Ross / KALEE WOOD5-7, 1-6
2025-09-17vs Doerr, SusanWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmie Schick / Gina Sutton vs Jill Burgdorfer / Rhonda Bonner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRuth Knox / Laurie Bowman vs Bridget Throm / Jennifer Fallon1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Kendrick / Jennifer Haake vs Katie Trenkle / Trisha Jolliffe2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRenetta Ramsdell / Amy Fangman vs Mallory Plungkhen / Paige Salveter1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Trouve / Kelli Valdez vs Michelle Wilson / Chriss Shoup-Duntz7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Kendrick / Lindsay Vise vs Erin Atherton / Betsy Norberg5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-03vs Vaughn, OlaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmie Schick / Amy Fangman vs Alli Gershon / Ana Lucia Barraza2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelli Valdez / Ruth Knox vs Keri Mooers / Sarah Acosta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAshley Lorei / Jennifer Haake vs Monique Marquette / Katie Zoldak6-2, 7-5
2025-08-27vs Groves, MaryLost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Clark / Renetta Ramsdell vs Carolyn Huffman / Allyson Braun6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelli Valdez / Laurie Bowman vs Alysen Abel / Kari Heybrock6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLindsay Vise / Jennifer Haake vs Mary Brauer / Dawn Weston7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-08-20vs Fendler, KathleenLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmie Schick / Renetta Ramsdell vs Carmen Kowalski / Jackie Gehrke6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusie Keefer / Laurie Bowman vs Kathleen Fendler / Ellen Griffin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAbbie Dougherty / Melissa Kendrick vs Whitney Arthur / Erin Duba3-6, 1-6
2025-08-13vs Chiao, DeniseLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Clark / Gina Sutton vs Kayla Ruelle / Lara Anderson7-6, 2-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Trouve / Ruth Knox vs Kandice Thurman / Vanessa Connell4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAshley Lorei / Lindsay Vise vs Lori Blinn / Grace Hilbrands6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5,4.0,4.5 Tri Level have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Gina Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Amie Schick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Jane Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Renetta Ramsdell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Amy Fangman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.56
Ruth Knox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Ashley Lorei
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Michelle Trouve
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Susie Keefer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Kelli Valdez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Lindsay Vise
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Jennifer Haake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Laurie Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Melissa Kendrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Abbie Dougherty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Kendrick + Lindsay Vise3257% games+20.2% vs expected
Melissa Kendrick + Ashley Lorei7654% games+13.2% vs expected
Renetta Ramsdell + Amie Schick11454% games+4.3% vs expected
Ruth Knox + Michelle Trouve3551% games+3.6% vs expected
Ruth Knox + Kelli Valdez211253% games+2.4% vs expected
Ashley Lorei + Lindsay Vise141053% games+1.8% vs expected
Susie Keefer + Laurie Bowman111352% games+1.4% vs expected
Amy Fangman + Renetta Ramsdell141051% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gina Sutton
78W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Amie Schick
73W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.89
Jane Clark
113W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.84
Renetta Ramsdell
79W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82
4.5
Amy Fangman
60W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.72
Ruth Knox
136W–121L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Ashley Lorei
49W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Michelle Trouve
107W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Susie Keefer
83W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Kelli Valdez
71W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
Lindsay Vise
39W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.32
Jennifer Haake
50W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Laurie Bowman
33W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Melissa Kendrick
24W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Abbie Dougherty
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.