Teams

JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-01vs JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Schaus / Julie Carlsen vs Mallory Burns / Amy Rottman2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGayle Garry / Jackie Graber vs Yesol Kwon / Jasmine Fontaine6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTeresa Doherty / Nicole DeLuca vs Tania Inga / Luz Lim1-6, 1-6
2026-08-25vs KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Schaus / Jessica Bradford vs Rebecca Cooper / Trisha Smith6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGretchen Hildner / Julie Carlsen vs Katie Cronin / Dawn Tenev7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJenny Duran / Lisa Wright vs Joanne Joliet / Stephanie Rock0-6, 2-6
2026-08-18vs ABroemel (Queens)Won 21
W#1 DoublesGretchen Hildner / Lisa Wright vs Allison Purmort / Virginia Wooten4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Graber / Jessica Bradford vs Susan Hoover / Kathy Kopec6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPinkie Watkins / Jenny Duran vs Marissa Connolly / Allison Broemel5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)2060243
2VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)2051229
3SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)2051224
4LDyer (Mountainbrook)2042548
5JWoodruff (CSRC)2042555
6LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)1030012
7MMcHugh (Queens)1030012
8KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)1030113
9SGrindle (WSRC)1021217
10CAckels (PCC)1021226
11KRichards (Raintree)1021220
12SNewman (BCC)1021218
13BDunn (PPRSC)1021217
14JJZhu (Park Road)1021326
15KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)1021326
16EBass/LThompson (Sardis)1021323
17LDiman/Magee (Carmel)1021322
18JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)1021427
19JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC)1142446
20KCox (MPCC)1142555
21SChandra (Charlotte Tennis - Sharon Lakes)1142547
22LHuntington (Park Road)1133648
23AMilas (OPRC)1133751
24KGreathouse (Russell)1124863
25BBrown (Park Crossing)1124857
26VTolson/Petras (FCC)000000
27CChilds (Blakeney)000000
28SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)000000
29AHall (Raintree)0112428
30SDurovic/Wilson (Palisades)0112430
31LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)0112428
32TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC)0112425
33JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)0112535
34MTurturro (OPRC)0112537
35ACutts (WSRC)0112528
36CMcKiernan (Raintree)0103638
37THyso (Life Time)0103634
38VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)0103636
39ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)0103632
40VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)0224961
41DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)02151068
42CMiller (Charlotte CC)02151067
43ATrexler/LPelletier (Queens)02151072
44ASmith (OPRC)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Gretchen Hildner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Janice Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Carolyn Schaus
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Jessica Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Lisa Wright
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.00
Gayle Garry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Jackie Graber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Julie Carlsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Jenny Duran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Nicole DeLuca
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pinkie Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gretchen Hildner + Jackie Graber3452% games+9.9% vs expected
Carolyn Schaus + Gretchen Hildner2352% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Schaus + Lisa Wright3252% gamesnot enough data
Janice Daniel + Gretchen Hildner033 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Schaus + Jessica Bradford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gretchen Hildner
36W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Janice Daniel
41W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Carolyn Schaus
30W–47L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Jessica Bradford
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Lisa Wright
33W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.02
3.5
Gayle Garry
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Jackie Graber
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Julie Carlsen
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.81
Jenny Duran
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.72
Nicole DeLuca
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.49
Pinkie Watkins
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Doherty
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.