Teams

GSTL40/Brady/Dunes

2026 Combo 40 & Over- GSTL · Adult WOMEN - 6.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs GSTL40/Stefaniuk/RLTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Prinzi / Amy Starnes vs Kim Comer / Marina Miroff6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrooke David / Amanda Hadstate vs Allison Stefaniuk / Lisa Leroux3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoycelyn Gallois / Margaret Singleton vs Lauren Jensen / Kathy Hedgecock1-6, 1-6
2026-08-10vs GSTL40/Guyton/GrandeDunesLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gore / Katie Sandoz vs Shannon Edwards / DeAnne Fischer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrooke David / Shai Kahn vs Georgiana King / Sarah Kirit2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Stokes / Susan Brady vs Sally Canepari / Gabriela Leggett6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult WOMEN - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Becky Walls
published 3.5
3.20
Sarah Prinzi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Shai Kahn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Katie Sandoz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Amanda Hadstate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Mary Stokes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Susan Brady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Andrea Lazar
published 3
2.81
Joan Spencer-Ruper
published
2.80
Pamela Yates
published
2.78
Kimberly Gore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Maryann Gaddy
published
2.73
Brooke David
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Susan Sparks
published
2.72
Patty Gresko
published
2.72
Georgeanne Rice
published
2.65
Debbie Edmonds
published 3
2.65
Margaret Singleton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Donna Zeglin
published
2.60
Cheryl Young
published 3
2.59
Sandye Hicks
published
Joycelyn Gallois
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Georgeanne Rice + Debbie Edmonds3347% games+9.2% vs expected
Susan Brady + Amanda Hadstate8256% games+7.6% vs expected
Katie Sandoz + Shai Kahn4548% games−2.8% vs expected
Patty Gresko + Sandye Hicks1534% games−11.0% vs expected
Georgeanne Rice + Kimberly Gore303 matchesnot enough data
Patty Gresko + Kimberly Gore213 matchesnot enough data
Shai Kahn + Susan Brady123 matchesnot enough data
Shai Kahn + Brooke David033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky Walls
24W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Sarah Prinzi
34W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Shai Kahn
21W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Katie Sandoz
41W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.13
3.5
Amanda Hadstate
22W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
Mary Stokes
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
Susan Brady
26W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Andrea Lazar
9W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Joan Spencer-Ruper
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Pamela Yates
13W–25L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Kimberly Gore
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Maryann Gaddy
15W–10L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Brooke David
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan Sparks
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
Patty Gresko
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Georgeanne Rice
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Debbie Edmonds
6W–15L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Margaret Singleton
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
Donna Zeglin
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Cheryl Young
10W–22L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Sandye Hicks
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Joycelyn Gallois
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.