Teams

Hits and Giggles

2021 VA Beach Adult 18 & Over Tennis Patrons · VA Beach Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-10vs Slice GirlsWon 10
W#2 SinglesErin Camden vs Martha McDermott6-1, 6-1
2021-06-03vs MoyerWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Cowen / Neha Jain vs Hobbs Wolcott / Sharon Goldner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-27vs CarrSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErin Camden / Rebecca Newton vs Julie Marchesi / Claire Tankersley6-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesChristine Cowen vs Merin Shekitka6-0, 6-3
2021-05-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Camden vs Perry DiBona4-6, 2-6
2021-05-13vs Love HurtsWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Betty Domanski vs Cheryl Cox / Lori Rattan6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesChristine Cowen vs Deborah Poch6-0, 6-0
2021-05-06Won 20
W#1 SinglesErin Camden vs Anna Ensley6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristine Cowen / Betty Domanski vs Ann Pardue / Jeanine Strickland6-2, 6-2
2021-04-22vs CarrWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Christine Cowen vs Cheryl Pierson / Claire Tankersley7-5, 6-4
2021-04-15vs Lee Power TennisWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Kelly Long vs Alyse Chickey / Lori Cox6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristine Cowen vs Sally Ortiz6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for VA Beach Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Kelly Long
published
3.82
Betty Domanski
published 4
3.43
Megan Farr
published
3.35
Erin Camden
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Rebecca Newton
published
3.23
Christine Cowen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Kimberly Cummings
published
2.89
Neha Jain
published
2.65
Mariel McClung
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Long + Betty Domanski3257% games−3.8% vs expected
Erin Camden + Christine Cowen6058% gamesnot enough data
Betty Domanski + Christine Cowen5086% gamesnot enough data
Megan Farr + Erin Camden134 matchesnot enough data
Megan Farr + Christine Cowen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Long
17W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Betty Domanski
102W–59L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
Megan Farr
23W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Erin Camden
141W–91L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
Rebecca Newton
12W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Christine Cowen
107W–97L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Kimberly Cummings
12W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
2.92
Neha Jain
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.89
Mariel McClung
8W–18L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.