Teams

KDouglas (Firethorne Country Club)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-01vs JSwanson (Springfield)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSaima Barkat / Danielle Fricke vs Anna Culver / Natalie Costello7-5, 6-3
2023-04-24vs MMcArdle (Weddington Chase)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKarisa Douglas / Alisa Longo vs Lutfiye Ugurlu / Laura Hoffman6-2, 6-4
2023-04-17vs SLee (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKarisa Douglas / Sue Ann Lang vs Mallery Horton / Heather Dineen6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Fricke / Alisa Longo vs Amy Snead / Angie Mehrizi6-2, 6-2
2023-04-04vs BHerman (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSaima Barkat / Danielle Fricke vs Carla Ackels / Julia Murphy6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRenu Renu Gill / Karisa Douglas vs Brooks Herman / Cindy Stater3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-03vs ETindel (Charlotte Country Club)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSaima Barkat / Renu Renu Gill vs Elizabeth Jack / Lindsay Griffin6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-28vs RFitzsimons (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSaima Barkat / Danielle Fricke vs Brittany Russell / Kylie Holt6-1, 6-4
2023-03-06vs JSwanson (Springfield)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSaima Barkat / Renu Renu Gill vs Julie Swanson / Mary Stewart Chatman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKarisa Douglas / Danielle Fricke vs Anna Culver / Danielle Brown3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-02-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesDanielle Fricke / Alisa Longo vs Michelle McArdle / Emily Reedy6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Alisa Longo
published 3
2.80
Saima Barkat
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Sue Ann Lang
published
2.65
Danielle Fricke
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.54
Renu Renu Gill
published
2.52
Karisa Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.19
Brooke Winkelman
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Fricke + Karisa Douglas7849% gamesnot enough data
Saima Barkat + Danielle Fricke314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alisa Longo
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Saima Barkat
34W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
Sue Ann Lang
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%8%92%
2.70
3
Danielle Fricke
55W–50L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.65
Renu Renu Gill
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
0%40%60%
2.54
2.5
Karisa Douglas
46W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%46%54%
2.52
2.5
Brooke Winkelman
32W–53L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.