Teams

EXE:Pickett:McGuire

2026 NH Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-06vs ALG:Page:MorrowLost 13
W#1 DoublesEric Knox / Martin Heward vs Adam Lesser / Paul Wiles6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKevin Rankins vs Mike Lewis6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Pickett / Barry Miller vs Michael Delaney / Bryan Playford3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Mayo / Chaz Brinkerhoff vs Christopher McCallum / Jeffrey Siegel3-6, 0-6
2025-11-23vs ALG:MacLeodWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Woodrow / Eric Knox vs Raghav Bansal / Damanvir Sidhu6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGreg Pickett / Clinton Frary vs William Frank / Joseph Mello2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarry Miller / Martin Heward vs Glenn Leo / Mark Hamilton6-4, 6-2
2025-11-16vs ALG:Page:MorrowLost 13
L#1 DoublesEric Knox / Matt Woodrow vs Dana Lavoie / Bryan Playford3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAditya Gore vs Mike Lewis6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGreg Pickett / Chaz Brinkerhoff vs Alex Mezibov / Daniel Horan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClinton Frary / Ashok Reddy vs Christopher McCallum / Jeffrey Hastings6-7, 3-6
2025-11-01vs MTS:Kennedy:KingSplit 22
W#1 DoublesClinton Frary / Matt Woodrow vs Thomas Bennett / Peter Ericson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAditya Gore vs Jim Kennedy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChaz Brinkerhoff / Barry Miller vs Christian Durgin / Eric Parenti3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Mayo / Ravi Lakshmikanthan vs Matthew Elliott / Mike Soffron2-6, 2-6
2025-10-18vs GB:Sorenson:BrowerLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Knox / Kevin Rankins vs Tung Ha / Lars Sorenson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChaz Brinkerhoff / Ravi Lakshmikanthan vs Thomas Griffin / David Reynolds1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeremy Fine / Clinton Frary vs Daglar Tanrikulu / Stephen Hohwald6-2, 7-5
2025-09-27vs MTS:Kennedy:KingWon 21
L#1 DoublesEric Knox / Ravi Lakshmikanthan vs Thomas Bennett / Peter Ericson1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKevin Rankins vs Jim Kennedy2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChaz Brinkerhoff / Ashok Reddy vs Chris Davey / Lee Herrington6-2, 7-5
2025-09-20vs ALG:MacLeodLost 13
L#1 DoublesEric Knox / Greg Pickett vs William Frank / Robert Bondaruk6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChaz Brinkerhoff vs Raghav Bansal4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClinton Frary / Jeremy Fine vs Prasad Tadi / Steve MacLeod6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarry Miller / Martin Heward vs Jeffrey Stone / Mark Hamilton6-2, 6-4
2025-09-13vs GB:Sorenson:BrowerLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Knox / Martin Heward vs Lars Sorenson / Thomas Griffin3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChaz Brinkerhoff vs Evan Tracz4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGreg Pickett / Jeremy Fine vs Brian Brower / Floris Iking6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GB:Sorenson:Brower0823921207
2MTS:Kennedy:King08161634281
3ALG:MacLeod08122044317
4EXE:Pickett:McGuire08122046326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Martin Heward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Clinton Frary
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Greg Pickett
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.67
Aditya Gore
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Eric Knox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Chaz Brinkerhoff
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.49
Barry Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.45
Kevin Rankins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Matt Woodrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Jeremy Fine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Ravi Lakshmikanthan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Ashok Reddy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Peter Mayo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Fine + Barry Miller4255% games+4.9% vs expected
Jeremy Fine + Greg Pickett12255% games+3.2% vs expected
Peter Mayo + Clinton Frary6946% games+2.7% vs expected
Greg Pickett + Eric Knox033 matchesnot enough data
Eric Knox + Ravi Lakshmikanthan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martin Heward
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Clinton Frary
22W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Greg Pickett
29W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Aditya Gore
34W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Eric Knox
5W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Chaz Brinkerhoff
18W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Barry Miller
45W–32L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kevin Rankins
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Matt Woodrow
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
Jeremy Fine
56W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Ravi Lakshmikanthan
20W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.29
3.5
Ashok Reddy
66W–41L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Peter Mayo
8W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.