Teams

Dellimore - ACAC Aces

2025 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-15vs Schartz - BHSC WarhogsLost 02
L#1 SinglesJonathan Proffitt vs Cristian Ferrer2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRuoyu Zhang vs Todd Sechser7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-13vs Shahane - KeswickWon 21
L#1 SinglesChris Stambaugh vs Jay Reeves3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJOSEPH MATHERS vs Amit Shahane7-6, 6-0
W#3 SinglesHarris Haynie vs Greg Benham6-4, 6-2
2025-10-06vs Harmon - Spin DoctorsWon 21
W#1 SinglesChris Stambaugh vs David Harmon6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHarris Haynie vs Aaron Streit2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJOSEPH MATHERS vs Damian Doyle6-3, 6-3
2025-10-03vs Shahane - KeswickWon 30
W#1 SinglesRuoyu Zhang vs John McNeil6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJonathan Proffitt vs Amit Shahane6-0, 7-5
W#3 SinglesChike Dellimore vs Greg Benham6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-22vs Schartz - BHSC WarhogsLost 12
L#1 SinglesRuoyu Zhang vs Cristian Ferrer0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChris Stambaugh vs Todd Sechser6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRamzi Talhouk vs Jay Bolus3-6, 5-7
2025-09-15vs Harmon - Spin DoctorsWon 21
W#1 SinglesChris Stambaugh vs Thomas Jackson6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRuoyu Zhang vs Aaron Streit6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesChike Dellimore vs Damian Doyle5-7, 3-6
2025-09-13vs Shahane - KeswickWon 21
L#1 SinglesRuoyu Zhang vs John McNeil2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJOSEPH MATHERS vs Greg Benham6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesChris Stambaugh vs Craig Ellis6-2, 6-1
2025-09-10vs Schartz - BHSC WarhogsWon 21
L#1 SinglesRamzi Talhouk vs Cristian Ferrer3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesHarris Haynie vs Andrew Juge6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJonathan Proffitt vs Brandon Schartz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-28vs Harmon - Spin DoctorsWon 30
W#1 SinglesRuoyu Zhang vs Aaron Streit6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRamzi Talhouk vs Damian Doyle6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesHarris Haynie vs David Harmon4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Stambaugh
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.23
Ruoyu Zhang
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.11
Harris Haynie
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Ramzi Talhouk
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.82
JOSEPH MATHERS
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
Chike Dellimore
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Jonathan Proffitt
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Stambaugh
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruoyu Zhang
6W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Harris Haynie
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.11
Ramzi Talhouk
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
JOSEPH MATHERS
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Chike Dellimore
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Proffitt
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.