Teams

NBadr (Queens)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Tues PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-08-22vs VWade (Springfield)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Kathryn Collins0-6, 3-6
2023-08-08Won 10
W#2 SinglesAbbey Ellis vs Carmen Hulce6-0, 6-1
2023-08-01vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Cori Niemann6-1, 6-0
2023-07-25vs JHamlin (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Emma SEGAL6-0, 6-0
2023-07-18vs KCronin (Piper Glen)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesAbbey Ellis vs Kathy Harborne3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Cindy Rhoten6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesNicole Badr vs Diana Blocker0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Lauren Dawley6-0, 6-0
2023-06-27Won 20
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Emily Battle6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesNicole Badr vs Tracy Thomas6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-26vs CLogar/RBostic (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Olivia Day6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesAbbey Ellis vs Cameron Logar4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-13vs SAndrews (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Caroline Cox6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesNicole Badr vs Stacy Andrews7-6, 6-4
2023-06-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Morgan Lee6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Emily McEwen
published
3.59
Cynthia Hoover
usually #1 Singles 93%, also #2 Singles 7% · published 3.5
3.24
Abbey Ellis
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Nicole Badr
usually #3 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3
2.83
Vicki King
published
2.66
Anna Sison
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Hoover + Nicole Badr8757% games+7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily McEwen
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Cynthia Hoover
301W–123L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Abbey Ellis
49W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Nicole Badr
95W–87L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Vicki King
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Anna Sison
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.