Teams

Blacik/Yson/Nasrabadi

2025 ONE Doubles SPRING · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-29vs DeSanto BellWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Blacik / Angel Nasrabadi vs Leeann Bell / Emily Heying7-5, 6-3
2025-04-22vs Stern: RAK-ettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Yson / Erin Blacik vs Amy Stern / Katie Day4-6, 5-7
2025-04-16vs Andre: Eyes UpLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Yson / Angel Nasrabadi vs Mary O'Brien / Lori Henrich6-7, 6-7
2025-04-08vs Nyholm-spring 1dubsWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Blacik / Sharon Yson vs Laura Huck / Lina Wang6-3, 6-0
2025-03-25vs HansenWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Blacik / Angel Nasrabadi vs Lizbeth Hansen / Jennie Ollila6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Sharon Yson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Erin Blacik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Angel Nasrabadi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Blacik + Angel Nasrabadi6352% games+12.2% vs expected
Angel Nasrabadi + Sharon Yson1445% games−9.8% vs expected
Erin Blacik + Sharon Yson1442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Yson
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Erin Blacik
19W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Angel Nasrabadi
37W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.