Teams

Klocek/18s/2.5/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming
Sep 17 6:00 PM
at Nicotri/18s/2.5/FAC
Franco's Athletic Club
Sep 24 6:00 PM
vs Nicotri/18s/2.5/FAC
Pelican Athletic Club
Oct 1 6:00 PM
at Nicotri/18s/2.5/FAC
Franco's Athletic Club
Oct 8 6:00 PM
vs Nicotri/18s/2.5/FAC
Pelican Athletic Club
Oct 15 6:00 PM
at Nicotri/18s/2.5/FAC
Franco's Athletic Club
Flight standings2 teams · Cov Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Klocek/18s/2.5/PAC000000
2Nicotri/18s/2.5/FAC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.44
Alexander Mata Iv
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.30
Chelsea Clement
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.30
Addie Troxclair
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.27
Alexander Vichinsky
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.25
Andrew Steen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Christopher Stant
published 2.5
Dennis Boushie Jr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Erick Fernandes
published 2.5
2.10
Elizabeth Klocek
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 2.5
2.06
Eric Tagesen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Jennifer Steen
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Kay Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lauren Tagesen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Steven Hart
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Addie Troxclair + Jennifer Steen4257% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Steen + Andrew Steen3345% gamesnot enough data
Chelsea Clement + Elizabeth Klocek213 matchesnot enough data
Chelsea Clement + Alexander Mata Iv213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Klocek + Kay Byrd033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alexander Mata Iv
14W–32L career · type S · 30 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.44
2.5
Chelsea Clement
15W–17L career · 16 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Addie Troxclair
16W–16L career · 17 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Alexander Vichinsky
5W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Andrew Steen
3W–3L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Christopher Stant
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Dennis Boushie Jr
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Erick Fernandes
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Elizabeth Klocek
10W–24L career · 17 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Eric Tagesen
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Jennifer Steen
13W–19L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kay Byrd
9W–18L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Tagesen
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa McCoy
8W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Hart
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.