Teams

Chili Peppers

Fire & Ice 2024 - NA · Fire & Ice 4.0 Division

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-08vs FlamethrowersWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarlisle Swann / Audra Worrich vs Mollie Garcia / Toni Hakim6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTammy Foster / Allyson McCale vs Sarah Landry / Tina OBryan6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesZdenka Edgar / Christina Li vs Terrie Butcher / Kathy Horton6-3, 7-5
2024-12-06vs Racq PacqLost 12
W#1 DoublesZdenka Edgar / Audra Worrich vs Stephanie Hastings / Stacy Hinze6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarlisle Swann / Jolene Moore vs Anita Moore / Hazel Manjarris3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTiffany May / Christina Li vs Jonna Davidson / Nikki Cortinas3-6, 3-6
2024-12-06vs Dare DoublesLost 03
L#1 DoublesAudra Worrich / Carlisle Swann vs Brenda Cozar / Angela Avila6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSilvia Suputra / Allyson McCale vs Jessica Garza / Cindy Robledo2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTammy Foster / Callie Musselman vs Xochitl Mendoza / Edna Mendoza1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 4.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Audra Worrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Allyson McCale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Amy Swaney
published 4
3.83
Carlisle Swann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Callie Musselman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Zdenka Edgar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Silvia Suputra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Christina Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Tiffany May
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jolene Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tammy Foster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlisle Swann + Audra Worrich4259% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audra Worrich
25W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
4.08
4
Allyson McCale
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Amy Swaney
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Carlisle Swann
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Callie Musselman
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Zdenka Edgar
30W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Silvia Suputra
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Christina Li
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tiffany May
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Jolene Moore
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tammy Foster
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.