Teams

Ladies - Wednesday

2022 Escambia Beg RS Quads · RS Quads - Fall Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for RS Quads - Fall Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Cheryl Vann
published 3.5
2.91
2.75
Jill Sparks
published
Grace Tegenkamp
published 3
2.67
Monika Greene
published
2.67
2.61
Candy Zuleger
published 3
2.55
Tanya Young
published
2.44
Michelle Loy
published
Amelia Murphy
published 2.5
2.23
Sara Ratliff
published
Kristin Longley
published
Skye Matthews
published
Venus Prince
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Sparks + Jacqueline Pommerening224 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Vann + Jill Sparks303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Vann
18W–9L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Jacqueline Pommerening
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Jill Sparks
15W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Grace Tegenkamp
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Monika Greene
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Wendy McIntosh Holmes
17W–11L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Candy Zuleger
16W–15L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61
Tanya Young
16W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%36%64%
2.55
Michelle Loy
14W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%69%31%
2.44
2.5
Amelia Murphy
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Ratliff
5W–25L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.23
Kristin Longley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Skye Matthews
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Venus Prince
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.