Teams

HCC Ross

2023 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-07-20vs Westwood BurkeWon 10
W#1 SinglesAMY LINES vs Emma Moredock6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Betsy Kersey
published 4
3.54
Joanna Bergeron
published
3.52
Beth Stinson
published 3.5
3.38
Stephanie Yablonski
published 3.5
3.34
Brittany Nichols
published 3.5
3.29
Sarah Martin
published
Anshu Garcha
published 3.5
3.04
Kimberly Ross
published
3.02
Renee Fisher
published
2.92
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Yablonski + AMY LINES18170% games+20.2% vs expected
Beth Stinson + Sarah Martin7265% games+11.9% vs expected
Beth Stinson + Joanna Bergeron303 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Martin + Renee Fisher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Betsy Kersey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joanna Bergeron
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Beth Stinson
28W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Stephanie Yablonski
124W–88L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Brittany Nichols
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
Sarah Martin
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Anshu Garcha
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Ross
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
Renee Fisher
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.02
3
Elizabeth Wiertel
29W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.