Teams

Davis-GGCC

2025 Combo 18 & Over-DLT · Women 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-05vs Rocconi-CCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeredith Furr / Rebecca Potter vs Britney Rocconi / Sarah Howard0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Loudon / Anna Haskins Patton vs Meredith Fletcher / Shelby Carter6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Davis / HOLLY ALVERSON vs Brianna Keeton / Mallorey Campbell6-1, 6-2
2025-09-30vs Rocconi-CCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMeredith Loudon / Elizabeth Weissinger vs Presley Roberson / Sarah Howard2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Marie Smythe / Rebecca Potter vs Hannah Lamb / Ana Parker Davis6-2, 6-3
2025-09-15vs Rocconi-CCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMeredith Loudon / Rebecca Potter vs Britney Rocconi / Meredith Fletcher6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Davis / HOLLY ALVERSON vs Ana Parker Davis / Sarah Howard0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMeriwalker Nipper / Nancy Mason vs Hannah Lamb / Brianna Keeton1-6, 2-6
2025-08-26vs Rocconi-CCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeredith Furr / Ann Marie Smythe vs Meredith Fletcher / Sarah Howard2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Weissinger / Meredith Loudon vs Presley Roberson / Britney Rocconi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeriwalker Nipper / Nancy Mason vs Amy Martinez / Amanda Roberts0-6, 1-6
2025-08-18vs Rocconi-CCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeredith Loudon / Anna Haskins Patton vs Meredith Fletcher / Sloane Fair2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAngela Davis / HOLLY ALVERSON vs Ana Parker Davis / Sarah Howard2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJami Smith / Rebecca Potter vs Mallorey Campbell / Shelby Carter2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.42
Meredith Loudon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.40
Rebecca Potter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.16
Ann Marie Smythe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.15
Meriwalker Nipper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Anna Haskins Patton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
Meredith Furr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
HOLLY ALVERSON
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Weissinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jami Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Shamoon
published
Nancy Mason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Loudon + Rebecca Potter4249% games+14.0% vs expected
Anna Haskins Patton + Meredith Loudon134 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Furr + Anna Haskins Patton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Loudon
9W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.42
Rebecca Potter
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Ann Marie Smythe
1W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Meriwalker Nipper
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.15
2.5
Anna Haskins Patton
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Meredith Furr
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
HOLLY ALVERSON
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.02
Elizabeth Weissinger
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jami Smith
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Shamoon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Mason
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.